Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Global Open (Feb 2022)

Superior Long-term Appearance of Strip Craniectomy Compared with Cranial Vault Reconstruction in Metopic Craniosynostosis

  • Ryan K. Badiee, BA, BS,
  • Emma Popowitz,
  • Ian T. Mark, MD,
  • Andre Alcon, MD,
  • Joan Hwang, BA,
  • Eve Rorison, RN, CPNP,
  • Kurtis I. Auguste, MD,
  • William Y. Hoffman, MD,
  • Peter P. Sun, MD,
  • Jason H. Pomerantz, MD

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000004097
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 10, no. 2
p. e4097

Abstract

Read online

Background:. Strip craniectomy with orthotic helmet therapy (SCOT) is an increasingly supported treatment for metopic craniosynostosis, although the long-term efficacy of deformity correction remains poorly defined. We compared the longterm outcomes of SCOT versus open cranial vault reconstruction (OCVR). Methods:. Patients who underwent OCVR or SCOT for isolated metopic synostosis with at least 3 years of follow-up were identified at our institution. Anthropometric measurements were used to assess baseline severity and postoperative skull morphology. Independent laypersons and craniofacial surgeons rated the appearance of each patient’s 3D photographs, compared to normal controls. Results:. Thirty-five patients were included (15 SCOT and 20 OCVR), with similar follow-up between groups (SCOT 7.9 ± 3.2 years, OCVR 9.2 ± 4.1 years). Baseline severity and postoperative anthropometric measurements were equivalent. Independent adolescent raters reported that the forehead, eye, and overall appearance of SCOT patients was better than OCVR patients (P 0.99), and were no more likely to report bullying (7% versus 15%, P = 0.82). Conclusions:. SCOT was associated with superior long-term appearance and perioperative outcomes compared with OCVR. These findings suggest that SCOT should be the treatment of choice for patients with a timely diagnosis of metopic craniosynostosis.