Filtration based assessment of CTCs and CellSearch® based assessment are both powerful predictors of prognosis for metastatic breast cancer patients
Hanna Huebner,
Peter A. Fasching,
Walter Gumbrecht,
Sebastian Jud,
Claudia Rauh,
Mark Matzas,
Peter Paulicka,
Katja Friedrich,
Michael P. Lux,
Bernhard Volz,
Paul Gass,
Lothar Häberle,
Franziska Meier-Stiegen,
Andreas Hartkopf,
Hans Neubauer,
Katrin Almstedt,
Matthias W. Beckmann,
Tanja N. Fehm,
Matthias Ruebner
Affiliations
Hanna Huebner
Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander University of Erlangen-Nuremberg
Peter A. Fasching
Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander University of Erlangen-Nuremberg
Walter Gumbrecht
Siemens Healthcare GmbH
Sebastian Jud
Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander University of Erlangen-Nuremberg
Claudia Rauh
Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander University of Erlangen-Nuremberg
Mark Matzas
Siemens Healthcare GmbH
Peter Paulicka
Siemens Healthcare GmbH
Katja Friedrich
Siemens Healthcare GmbH
Michael P. Lux
Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander University of Erlangen-Nuremberg
Bernhard Volz
Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander University of Erlangen-Nuremberg
Paul Gass
Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander University of Erlangen-Nuremberg
Lothar Häberle
Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander University of Erlangen-Nuremberg
Franziska Meier-Stiegen
Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Heinrich Heine University of Düsseldorf
Andreas Hartkopf
Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Tuebingen
Hans Neubauer
Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Heinrich Heine University of Düsseldorf
Katrin Almstedt
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Johannes Gutenberg University
Matthias W. Beckmann
Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander University of Erlangen-Nuremberg
Tanja N. Fehm
Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Heinrich Heine University of Düsseldorf
Matthias Ruebner
Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander University of Erlangen-Nuremberg
Abstract Background The assessment of circulating tumor cells (CTCs) has been shown to enable monitoring of treatment response and early detection of metastatic breast cancer (MBC) recurrence. The aim of this study was to compare a well-established CTC detection method based on immunomagnetic isolation with a new, filtration-based platform. Methods In this prospective study, two 7.5 ml blood draws were obtained from 60 MBC patients and CTC enumeration was assessed using both the CellSearch® and the newly developed filtration-based platform. We analyzed the correlation of CTC-positivity between both methods and their ability to predict prognosis. Overall survival (OS) was calculated and Kaplan-Meier curves were estimated with thresholds of ≥1 and ≥5 detected CTCs. Results The CTC positivity rate of the CellSearch® system was 56.7% and of the filtration-based platform 66.7%. There was a high correlation of CTC enumeration obtained with both methods. The OS for patients without detected CTCs, regardless of the method used, was significantly higher compared to patients with one or more CTCs (p < 0.001). The median OS of patients with no CTCs vs. ≥ 1 CTC assessed by CellSearch® was 1.83 years (95% CI: 1.63–2.02) vs. 0.74 years (95% CI: 0.51–1.52). If CTCs were detected by the filtration-based method the median OS times were 1.88 years (95% CI: 1.74–2.03) vs. 0.59 years (95% CI: 0.38–0.80). Conclusions The newly established EpCAM independently filtration-based system is a suitable method to determine CTC counts for MBC patients. Our study confirms CTCs as being strong predictors of prognosis in our population of MBC patients.