RMD Open (Jan 2025)

Reliability of the OMERACT Giant cell arteritis Ultrasonography Score (OGUS): results of a patient-based exercise involving experts and non-experts in vascular ultrasonography

  • Christian Dejaco,
  • Stavros Chrysidis,
  • Sara Monti,
  • Cristina Ponte,
  • Peter Mandl,
  • Lene Terslev,
  • Bhaskar Dasgupta,
  • Alojzija Hočevar,
  • Christina Duftner,
  • Wolfgang Schmidt,
  • Carlos Pineda,
  • Eugenio De Miguel,
  • Andreas P Diamantopoulos,
  • Helen Keen,
  • Kati Mykkänen,
  • George A Bruyn,
  • Wolfgang Hartung,
  • Maria Antonietta D’Agostino,
  • Nikitas Gkikopoulos,
  • Luca Seitz,
  • Adela-Cristina Sarbu,
  • Eva Manger,
  • Berit Dalsgaard Nielsen,
  • Norbert Redlinger,
  • Veerendra Chadachan,
  • Maria Correyero,
  • Giovanni Fulvio,
  • Vesselina Kurteva,
  • Paolo Mercatelli,
  • Irina Midtgard,
  • Raili Muller,
  • Duriad Reffat

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1136/rmdopen-2024-004667
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 11, no. 1

Abstract

Read online

Objective To test the reliability of the Outcome Measures in Rheumatology Giant cell arteritis (GCA) Ultrasonography Score (OGUS) and other composite scores in a patient-based exercise involving experts and non-experts in vascular ultrasonography.Methods Six GCA patients were scanned twice (two rounds separated ≥3 hours) by 12 experts and 12 non-experts. Non-experts received 90 min of theoretical and 240 min of practical training between rounds 1 and 2. Ultrasonography was conducted on temporal arteries (common superficial, frontal and parietal branches) and axillary arteries bilaterally to calculate the OGUS, the Southend score and the Halo count. Inter-reader and intra-reader reliability were assessed by intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC).Results Mean age of GCA patients was 78±5.1 years, 2 (33.3%) were women, and all were in clinical remission. Expert inter-reader ICC of the OGUS was 0.60 in both rounds, 0.40 in round 1 and 0.51 in round 2 for the Southend score and 0.45 and 0.52, respectively, for the Halo count. Median ICCs for intra-reader reliability were 0.86, 0.73 and 0.65 for the OGUS, Southend score and Halo count, respectively.For non-experts, inter-reader ICCs in round 1 were 0.20 for the OGUS, 0.20 for a normalised Southend score (=score divided by available segments) and 0.35 for a normalised Halo count. After training, inter-reader reliability ICCs improved to 0.52, 0.29 and 0.54, respectively.Conclusion Inter-reader reliability was fair to moderate, and intra-reader reliability was good for OGUS, Southend score and Halo count among experts. Inter-reader reliability of non-experts in vascular ultrasonography improved after the training.