Pros and Cons of Two Methods of Anaerobic Alactic Energy Assessment in a High-Intensity CrossFit^® Workout

Abstract

The current study aimed to evidence the strengths and weaknesses of two indirect methods for assessing the anaerobic alactic contribution to a specific CrossFit® workout. Thirty experienced crossfitters performed the Fran workout at maximal intensity, and ventilatory data were collected during the recovery period using a telemetric portable gas analyser to assess the oxygen uptake (VO2) of the off-kinetics fast component (Anarecovery). The kinetics of maximal phosphocreatine splitting (AnaPCr) were determined based on the literature. No differences between the two methods were observed (31.4 ± 4.0 vs. 30.4 ± 4.1 kJ for Anarecovery and AnaPCr, respectively). Despite the existence of some caveats (e.g., errors derived from a delay at the onset of VO2 recovery and the assumption of given values in the concentration of phosphocreatine per kilogram of wet muscle, respectively) in both methods, the data indicate that they yield similar results and allow for estimations of alactic energy contribution from a short-duration and high intensity CrossFit® routine. The current data contributes to CrossFit® workout evaluations and training strategies, helping researchers to evaluate crossfitters more accurately. The advantage of the two methods used in the current study is that they are non-invasive, which differs greatly from muscle biopsies.

Keywords

• anaerobic alactic contribution
• phosphocreatine
• oxygen uptake