International Journal of Gastrointestinal Intervention (Apr 2019)

Budd-Chiari syndrome managed with percutaneous recanalization: Long-term outcome and comparison with medical therapy

  • Chinmay Bhimaji Kulkarni,
  • Srikanth Moorthy,
  • Sreekumar Karumathil Pullara,
  • Nirmal Kumar Prabhu,
  • Ramiah Rajesh Kannan,
  • Puthukudiyil Kader Nazar

DOI
https://doi.org/10.18528/ijgii180001
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 8, no. 2
pp. 74 – 81

Abstract

Read online

Background : To compare the outcomes in a group of patients with Budd-Chiari syndrome (BCS) managed by percutaneous recanalization with a group of patients who were managed by medical therapy alone. Methods : We retrieved the hospital records of 37 patients with BCS admitted to our facility between 2004 to 2017 and identified 24 patients (male:female = 10:14; mean age, 32.7 ± 12.5 years) who underwent percutaneous recanalization. Remaining thirteen patients (male:female = 3:10; mean age, 36.77 ± 14.71 years), were managed by medical therapy. Technical and clinical results, complications, and primary patency of percutaneous recanalization were analyzed. Overall and symptom-free survival rates, the frequency of symptom recurrence, and the number of readmissions for recurrent symptoms were analyzed in both interventional treatment and medical therapy groups. Results : Technical success for recanalization of hepatic vein/inferior venecava by angioplasty ± stenting was achieved in 22 patients (22/24, 91.7%). Clinical success was achieved in 19 patients (19/24, 79.2%). Overall survival for patients who underwent percutaneous recanalization at 1 year and five years was 87.0% and 87.0% and for patients with medical therapy was 90.1% and 45.5%, respectively (P = 0.710). Symptom-free survival for patients who underwent percutaneous recanalization at 1 year and five year was 93.3% and 81.7% and for patients with medical therapy was 26.0% and 0%, respectively (P < 0.001). In the intervention group, 4 patients (4/24, 16.7%) were admitted for recurrent symptoms (median number of readmissions 1, range: 1-2) whereas in medically managed patients 9 patients (9/13, 69.2%) were readmitted (median number of readmissions, 2; range, 1-5) (P = 0.003). Conclusion : There was no statistically significant difference in overall survival of patients managed with percutaneous recanalization and medical therapy. Percutaneous recanalization had definite benefit in terms of fewer recurrent symptoms and hospital admissions, hence should be performed whenever technically feasible.

Keywords