Frontiers in Neuroinformatics (Dec 2016)

Automated Quality Assessment of Structural Magnetic Resonance Brain Images Based on a Supervised Machine Learning Algorithm

  • Ricardo Andres Pizarro,
  • Ricardo Andres Pizarro,
  • Xi Cheng,
  • Xi Cheng,
  • Xi Cheng,
  • Alan Barnett,
  • Hervé LEMAITRE,
  • Hervé LEMAITRE,
  • Beth A Verchinsky,
  • Beth A Verchinsky,
  • Aaron L. Goldman,
  • Aaron L. Goldman,
  • Ena Xiao,
  • Ena Xiao,
  • Qian Luo,
  • Karen F Berman,
  • Joseph H. Callicott,
  • Joseph H. Callicott,
  • Daniel R Weinberger,
  • Daniel R Weinberger,
  • Daniel R Weinberger,
  • Venkata Satyanand Mattay,
  • Venkata Satyanand Mattay,
  • Venkata Satyanand Mattay

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fninf.2016.00052
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 10

Abstract

Read online

High-resolution three-dimensional magnetic resonance imaging (3D-MRI) is being increasingly used to delineate morphological changes underlying neuropsychiatric disorders. Unfortunately, artifacts frequently compromise the utility of 3D-MRI yielding irreproducible results, from both type I and type II errors. It is therefore critical to screen 3D-MRIs for artifacts before use. Currently, quality assessment involves slice-wise visual inspection of 3D-MRI volumes, a procedure that is both subjective and time consuming. Automating the quality rating of 3D-MRI could improve the efficiency and reproducibility of the procedure. The present study is one of the first efforts to apply a support vector machine (SVM) algorithm in the quality assessment of structural brain images, using global and region of interest (ROI) automated image quality features developed in-house. SVM is a supervised machine-learning algorithm that can predict the category of test datasets based on the knowledge acquired from a learning dataset. The performance (accuracy) of the automated SVM approach was assessed, by comparing the SVM-predicted quality labels to investigator-determined quality labels. The accuracy for classifying 1457 3D-MRI volumes from our database using the SVM approach is around 80%. These results are promising and illustrate the possibility of using SVM as an automated quality assessment tool for 3D-MRI.

Keywords