Journal of the Formosan Medical Association (Sep 2007)

Comparison Between Pancreaticojejunostomy and Pancreaticogastrostomy After Pancreaticoduodenectomy

  • Wen-Liang Fang,
  • Yi-Ming Shyr,
  • Cheng-Hsi Su,
  • Tien-Hua Chen,
  • Chew-Wun Wu,
  • Wing-Yiu Lui

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0929-6646(08)60033-9
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 106, no. 9
pp. 717 – 727

Abstract

Read online

Pancreatic leakage is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality after pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD). Pancreaticogastrostomy (PG) has been reported to be associated with a lower pancreatic leakage rate and morbidity rate than pancreaticojejunostomy (PJ). This study compared the preoperative characteristics, surgical risk factors, intraoperative parameters, and postoperative outcome between PJ and PG. Methods: From March 1992 to March 2005, a comparative study between PJ and PG for patients with periampullary lesions undergoing PD was conducted. A total of 377 consecutive patients underwent PD. Among them, 188 patients underwent PJ and 189 underwent PG. Results: The overall mortality, morbidity and pancreatic leakage following PD were 5%, 45.1% and 10.6%, respectively. The mortality, morbidity and pancreatic leakage were 8.9%, 56.4% and 17.6% in the PJ group, and 2.1%, 33.9% and 3.7% in the PG group (p 65 years) were identified as risk factors for pancreatic leakage, while PJ, soft pancreas, pancreatic duct stenting and low surgical volume ( 65 years) were identified to be surgical risk factors for mortality. Conclusion: PG is a safer method than PJ following PD as a significantly lower rate of pancreatic leakage, surgical morbidity and mortality, shorter operation time, and shorter postoperative hospital stay are reported.

Keywords