Biomedicines (Sep 2022)

Ultra-Hypofractionated Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy for Localized Prostate Cancer: Clinical Outcomes, Patterns of Recurrence, Feasibility of Definitive Salvage Treatment, and Competing Oncological Risk

  • Marcin Miszczyk,
  • Monika Szołtysik,
  • Maja Hasterok,
  • Gregor Goldner,
  • Paweł Rajwa,
  • Agnieszka Namysł-Kaletka,
  • Aleksandra Napieralska,
  • Małgorzata Kraszkiewicz,
  • Małgorzata Stąpór-Fudzińska,
  • Bartłomiej Tomasik,
  • Grzegorz Woźniak,
  • Grzegorz Głowacki,
  • Konrad Kaminiów,
  • Matthias Moll,
  • Łukasz Magrowski,
  • Wojciech Majewski

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines10102446
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 10, no. 10
p. 2446

Abstract

Read online

A cohort of 650 patients treated for localized prostate cancer (PCa) with CyberKnifeTM ultra-hypofractionated radiotherapy between 2011 and 2018 was retrospectively analyzed in terms of survival, patterns of failure, and outcomes of second-line definitive salvage therapies. The analysis was performed using survival analysis including the Kaplan–Meier method and Cox regression analysis. At a median follow-up of 49.4 months, the main pattern of failure was local–regional failure (7.4% in low-, and 13% in intermediate/high-risk group at five years), followed by distant metastases (3.6% in low-, and 6% in intermediate/high-risk group at five years). Five-year likelihood of developing a second malignancy was 7.3%; however, in the vast majority of the cases, the association with prior irradiation was unlikely. The 5-year overall survival was 90.2% in low-, and 88.8% in intermediate/high-risk patients. The independent prognostic factors for survival included age (HR 1.1; 95% CI 1.07–1.14) and occurrence of a second malignancy (HR 3.67; 95% CI 2.19–6.15). Definitive local salvage therapies were feasible in the majority of the patients with local–regional failure, and uncommonly in patients with distant metastases, with an estimated second-line progression free survival of 67.8% at two years. Competing oncological risks and age were significantly more important for patients’ survival compared to primary disease recurrence.

Keywords