Clinical and Experimental Emergency Medicine (Dec 2015)

Change in guardians’ preference for computed tomography after explanation by emergency physicians in pediatric head injury

  • Jin Hee Jeong,
  • Jin Hee Lee,
  • Kyuseok Kim,
  • Joong Eui Rhee,
  • Tae Yun Kim,
  • You Hwan Jo,
  • Yu Jin Kim,
  • Jae Hyuk Lee,
  • Changwoo Kang,
  • Soo Hoon Lee,
  • Joonghee Kim,
  • Chan Jong Park,
  • Hyuksool Kwon

DOI
https://doi.org/10.15441/ceem.14.039
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 2, no. 4
pp. 226 – 235

Abstract

Read online

Objective Head injury in children is a common problem presenting to emergency departments, and cranial computed tomography scanning is the diagnostic standard for these patients. Several decision rules are used to determine whether computed tomography scans should be used; however, the use of computed tomography scans is often influenced by guardians’ preference toward the scans. The objective of this study was to identify changes in guardian preference for minor head injuries after receiving an explanation based on the institutional clinical practice guideline. Methods A survey was conducted between July 2010 and June 2012. Patients younger than 16 years with a Glasgow Coma Scale score of 15 after a head injury and their guardians were included. Pre- and post-explanation questionnaires were given to guardians to assess their preference for computed tomography scans and factors related to the degree of preference. Treating physicians explained the risks and benefits of cranial computed tomography scanning using the institutional clinical practice guideline. Guardian preference for a computed tomography scan was examined using a 100-mm visual analog scale. Results In total, 208 patients and their guardians were included in this survey. Guardian preference for computed tomography scans was significantly reduced after explanation (46.7 vs. 17.4, P<0.01). Pre-explanation preference and the strength of the physician recommendation to get a computed tomography were the most important factors affecting pre- and post-explanation changes in preferences. Conclusion Explanation of the risks and benefits of cranial computed tomography scans using the institutional clinical practice guideline may significantly reduce guardian preference for computed tomography scans.

Keywords