International Journal of Arrhythmia (Oct 2022)

Rotational mechanical dilator sheaths for effective transvenous lead extraction

  • Seung-Jung Park,
  • Ju Youn Kim,
  • Kyoung-Min Park,
  • Young Keun On,
  • June Soo Kim

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s42444-022-00076-w
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 23, no. 1
pp. 1 – 9

Abstract

Read online

Abstract Background An exponential rise in clinical demand for cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) therapy is observed all over the world due to the rapidly expanding lifespan. Accordingly, appropriate lead management including lead extraction is becoming increasingly essential components for the comprehensive care of patients with various CIEDs. Main body With a high success rate and a low complication rate, transvenous lead extraction (TLE) has now been established as first-line therapy for lead extraction. However, TLE is often challenging when there are heavily calcified fibrous adhesions between leads and cardiovascular structures. Recently, rotational mechanical dilator (RMD) sheaths were introduced to resolve this issue and facilitate TLE procedure. There are two types of commercially available RMD sheaths, Evolution® systems and TightRail™. Thorough knowledge of the proper use of the RMD devices is essential to increase success rate and to reduce complications of TLE. In the present review, mechanical features, various techniques, and clinical data of RMD sheaths will be described. Conclusion According to recent advancement of device technology, the clinical outcomes of TLE using the RMD sheaths are continuously improving. However, as the RMD sheath is a potentially aggressive tool, special care should be taken when used in patients with longer lead ages. Author names: Please confirm if the author names are presented accurately and in the correct sequence (given name, family name). Author 2 Given name: Ju Youn, Family name: Kim; Author 4 Given name: Young Keun, Family name: On; Author 5 Given name: June Soo, Family name: Kim. Also, kindly confirm the details in the metadata are correct.All of the author names are correct.

Keywords