Dilemmas of philosophical training: Between analytical and continental

Abstract

These reflections have a theoretical character and deal with the question of the formation of the new levels of researchers in the field of philosophy in particular, but given its transdisciplinary dimension, the question extends to the training of humanists. The aim is to show how the debate within the academic philosophy between Analysts and Continents has led the former to choose a specialized scientific-type training approach and the latter, instead, to favour the approaches of the human sciences. Two perspectives that have created two currents of training, the confrontation of which, often close, has made the international comparison fruitful, influencing the destinies and academic careers of the new researchers. The approach is qualitative and the epistemological background that frames the problems is hermeneutical.