Frontiers in Earth Science (Jun 2023)
Distribution of boulders in coastal waters of Western Pomerania, German Baltic Sea
Abstract
This study contributes to a better understanding of geogenic reef distribution in the southern Baltic Sea and highlights the implications of survey-related factors on automated boulder classification when utilizing data from multiple surveys. The distribution of hard grounds and reefs is needed as a baseline for geological and biological studies, but also for offshore construction, navigation and coastal management. In this study we provide maps of the distribution of geogenic reefs for about 750 km2 in the southern Baltic Sea, at the sites Wismar Bay, Darss Sill and Plantagenet Ground. The maps are based on full-coverage backscatter surveys with different side scan sonar and multibeam echo sounder systems. The distribution and number of boulders in the backscatter maps was determined using a convolutional neural network combined with quality control by human experts. The extent of the geogenic reefs was calculated on the basis of the number of boulders in 50 m x 50 m grid cells. We compare the results with previous reef maps based on point sampling, which show reefs of either biogenic or geogenic origin. According to the earlier maps, 11% of the Plantagenet Ground seabed was classified as reef habitat type. This is similar to the result of our study (12%), although we only considered reefs of geogenic origin. In the Darss Sill, geogenic reefs are larger in this study than in previous maps (30% versus 23%). In both regions, the spatial distribution of reefs differs significantly between old and new maps. For Wismar Bay, previous maps classify 3% of the seafloor as habitat type reef, whereas this study classifies 35% as geogenic reef. The use of automated classification during seafloor mapping allowed large areas to be interpreted in a few days. It also provided more information on the distribution of boulders within the geogenic reef. However, the boulder distribution maps show the negative effects of survey geometry, frequency and environmental conditions on automated boulder classification when data from different surveys are combined.
Keywords
