IEEE Access (Jan 2024)

Chip Analysis for Tool Wear Monitoring in Machining: A Deep Learning Approach

  • Atiq Ur Rehman,
  • Tahira Salwa Rabbi Nishat,
  • Mobyen Uddin Ahmed,
  • Shahina Begum,
  • Abhishek Ranjan

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3443517
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 12
pp. 112672 – 112689

Abstract

Read online

Recent strides in integrating artificial intelligence (AI) with production systems align with the trend towards highly automated manufacturing, demanding smarter machinery. This dovetails with the overarching vision of Industry 4.0, moving beyond conventional models towards employing AI for real-time modeling of production processes, enabling adaptable and learning-enabled models. This study focuses on leveraging cutting-edge deep learning techniques to monitor and classify tool wear using authentic image data from machining processes. Various deep learning algorithms, including CNN, AlexNet, EfficientNetB0, MobileNetV2, CoAtNet-0, and ResNet18, are explored for monitoring and measuring wear through images of machining chips. The collected images of machining chips are categorized as ‘Accepted’, ‘Unaccepted’, and ‘Optimal’. Due to imbalanced datasets, the study investigates two distinct strategies: upsampling and downsampling. The study also aimes to enhance sensitivity for a specific minority class to meet industrial requirements. The study showed that upsampling enhanced accuracy and almost fulfilled the stated requirements, whereas downsampling did not achieve the desired outcomes. The study evaluates and compares the effectiveness of recently introduced deep learning algorithms with other CNN-based architectures in classifying tool wear states in real-world scenarios. It sheds light on the challenges faced by the machining industry, particularly the prevalent issue of class imbalance in real-world machining data. The observed results indicate that ResNet18 and AlexNet outperform other algorithms, achieving a weighted average accuracy of 96% for both multiclass and binary classification problems when considering upsampled datasets. Consequently, the study concludes that both ResNet18 and AlexNet demonstrate adaptability to class imbalances, generalization to real-world machining scenarios, and competitive accuracy.

Keywords