Cancer Imaging (Aug 2024)

CT and MRI features of sarcomatoid urothelial carcinoma of the bladder and its differential diagnosis with conventional urothelial carcinoma

  • Jiayi Zhuo,
  • Jingjing Han,
  • Lingjie Yang,
  • Yu Wang,
  • Guangzi Shi,
  • Zhuoheng Yan,
  • Lu Yang,
  • Riyu Han,
  • Fengqiong Huang,
  • Xiaohua Ban,
  • Xiaohui Duan

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s40644-024-00748-x
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 24, no. 1
pp. 1 – 13

Abstract

Read online

Abstract Background Sarcomatoid urothelial carcinoma (SUC) is a rare and highly malignant form of bladder cancer with a poor prognosis. Currently, there is limited information on the imaging features of bladder SUC and reliable indicators for distinguishing it from conventional urothelial carcinoma (CUC). The objective of our study was to identify the unique imaging characteristics of bladder SUC and determine factors that aid in its differential diagnosis. Materials and methods This retrospective study enrolled 22 participants with bladder SUC and 61 participants with CUC. The clinical, pathologic, and CT/MRI data from both groups were recorded, and a comparison was conducted using univariate analysis and multinomial logistic regression for distinguishing SUC from CUC. Results The majority of SUCs were located in the trigone of the bladder and exhibited large tumor size, irregular shape, low ADC values, Vesical Imaging-Reporting and Data System (VI-RADS) score ≥ 4, the presence of necrosis, and an invasive nature. Univariate analysis revealed significant differences in terms of tumor location, shape, the maximum long-axis diameter (LAD), the short-axis diameter (SAD), ADC-value, VI-RADS scores, necrosis, extravesical extension (EVE), pelvic peritoneal spread (PPS), and hydronephrosis/ureteral effusion (p < .001 ~ p = .037) between SUCs and CUCs. Multinomial logistic regression found that only SAD (p = .014) and necrosis (p = .003) emerged as independent predictors for differentiating between SUC and CUC. The model based on these two factors achieved an area under curve (AUC) of 0.849 in ROC curve analysis. Conclusion Bladder SUC demonstrates several distinct imaging features, including a high incidence of trigone involvement, large tumor size, and obvious invasiveness accompanied by necrosis. A bladder tumor with a large SAD and evidence of necrosis is more likely to be SUC rather than CUC.

Keywords