Lenalidomide-based triplet regimens in first relapsed multiple myeloma patients: real-world evidence from a propensity score matched analysis
Silvia Mangiacavalli,
Claudio Salvatore Cartia,
Monica Galli,
Sara Pezzatti,
Angelo Belotti,
Francesca Fazio,
Roberto Mina,
Magda Marcatti,
Anna Cafro,
Renato Zambello,
Laura Paris,
Gregorio Barilà,
Cecilia Olivares,
Alessandra Pompa,
Rita Mazza,
Francesca Farina,
Martina Soldarini,
Pietro Benvenuti,
Giuseppina Pagani,
Michele Palumbo,
Valeria Masoni,
Virginia Valeria Ferretti,
Catherine Klersy,
Luca Arcaini,
Maria Teresa Petrucci
Affiliations
Silvia Mangiacavalli
Division of Hematology, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia
Claudio Salvatore Cartia
Division of Hematology, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia
Monica Galli
Division of Hematology, ASST Papa Giovanni XXIII, Bergamo
Sara Pezzatti
Division of Hematology, San Gerardo Hospital, Monza
Angelo Belotti
Division of Hematology, A.O. Spedali Civili, Brescia
Francesca Fazio
Division of Hematology, Department of Translational and Precision Medicine, Azienda Ospedaliera Policlinico Umberto I, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome
Roberto Mina
SSD Clinical Trial in Oncoematologia e Mieloma Multiplo, Division of Hematology, University of Torino, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, Torino
Magda Marcatti
Division of Hematology and Bone Marrow Transplant Unit, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan
Anna Cafro
Hematology Unit, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Milan
Renato Zambello
Hematology and Clinical Immunology, Department of Medicine, Azienda Ospedaliera di Padova, Padova
Laura Paris
Division of Hematology, ASST Papa Giovanni XXIII, Bergamo
Gregorio Barilà
University School of Medicine, Department of Medicine, Hematology and Clinical Immunology Branch, Padova
Cecilia Olivares
Division of Hematology, Ospedale di Circolo and Fondazione Macchi, University of Insubria, Varese
Alessandra Pompa
Division of Hematology and Stem Cell Transplantation, Fondazione Ca' Granda IRCCS Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan
Rita Mazza
Humanitas Clinical and Research Center, IRCCS, Milan
Francesca Farina
Division of Hematology and Bone Marrow Transplant Unit, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan
Martina Soldarini
Hematology Unit, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Milan
Pietro Benvenuti
Division of Hematology, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia
Giuseppina Pagani
Department of Molecular Medicine, University of Pavia, Pavia
Michele Palumbo
Department of Molecular Medicine, University of Pavia, Pavia
Valeria Masoni
Department of Molecular Medicine, University of Pavia, Pavia
Virginia Valeria Ferretti
Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics Service, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia
Catherine Klersy
Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics Service, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia
Luca Arcaini
Division of Hematology, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia, Italy; Department of Molecular Medicine, University of Pavia, Pavia
Maria Teresa Petrucci
Division of Hematology, Department of Translational and Precision Medicine, Azienda Ospedaliera Policlinico Umberto I, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome
Lenalidomide and dexamethasone (Rd)-based triplets, in particular carfilzomib-Rd (KRd) and daratumumab-Rd (DaraRd), represent a standard of care in lenalidomide-sensitive multiple myeloma (MM) patients in first relapse. Meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials (RCT), suggested better outcome with DaraRd. Trying to address this issue in clinical practice, we collected data of 430 consecutive MM patients addressed to Rd-based triplets in first relapse between January 2017 and March 2021. Overall, the most common used regimen was DaraRd, chosen in almost half of the cases (54.4%), followed by KRd (34.6%). Different triplets were used much less commonly. In an attempt to limit the imbalance of a retrospective analysis, we conducted a propensity score matching (PSM) comparison between DaraRd and KRd. After PSM, efficacy of DaraRd versus KRd was similar in terms of overall-response rate (ORR) (OR: 0.9, P=0.685) as well as of very good partial response (VGPR) or better (OR: 0.9, P=0.582). The median progression-free survival (PFS) was significantly longer for DaraRd (29.8 vs. 22.5 months; P=0.028). DaraRd was tolerated better, registering a lower rate of grade 3-4 non-hematological toxicity (OR: 0.4, P<0.001). With the limitations of any retrospective analysis, our real-life PSM comparison between DaraRd and KRd, in first-relapse MM patients, showed better tolerability and prolonged PFS of DaraRd, although with some gaps of performance, in particular of DaraRd, with respect to RCT. Carfilzomib-containing regimens, like KRd, still remain a valid second-line option in the emerging scenario of first-line daratumumab-based therapy.