Canadian Journal of Kidney Health and Disease (Apr 2022)

Can Peer Review Be Kinder? Supportive Peer Review: A Re-Commitment to Kindness and a Call to Action

  • Catherine M. Clase,
  • Elizabeth Dicks,
  • Rachel Holden,
  • Manish M. Sood,
  • Adeera Levin,
  • Kamyar Kalantar-Zadeh,
  • Linda W Moore,
  • Susan J. Bartlett,
  • Aminu K. Bello,
  • Clara Bohm,
  • Darren Bridgewater,
  • Josee Bouchard,
  • Dylan Burger,
  • Juan Jesús Carrero,
  • Maoliosa Donald,
  • Meghan Elliott,
  • Maya J. Goldenberg,
  • Meg Jardine,
  • Ngan N. Lam,
  • W. Joy Maddigan,
  • François Madore,
  • Thomas A. Mavrakanas,
  • Amber O. Molnar,
  • G. V. Ramesh Prasad,
  • Claudio Rigatto,
  • Karthik K. Tennankore,
  • Elena Torban,
  • Laurel Trainor,
  • Christine A. White,
  • Sunny Hartwig

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/20543581221080327
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 9

Abstract

Read online

Peer review aims to select articles for publication and to improve articles before publication. We believe that this process can be infused by kindness without losing rigor. In 2014, the founding editorial team of the Canadian Journal of Kidney Health and Disease (CJKHD) made an explicit commitment to treat authors as we would wish to be treated ourselves. This broader group of authors reaffirms this principle, for which we suggest the terminology “supportive review.”