Elastic, viscoelastic and viscoplastic contributions to compliance during deformation under stress in prosthodontic temporization materials

Abstract

Purpose: The goal of this investigation was to characterize the compliance properties in selected polymers used for temporary (provisional crown and bridge) applications. Method: Polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA)- and polyethyl methacrylate (PEMA)-based JET and TRIM II were investigated along with two bisacryl composite resins (LUXATEMP and PROTEMP 3 GARANT). Rectangular samples of the resins were subjected to creep–recovery tests in a dynamic mechanical analyzer at and near the oral temperature (27 °C, 37 °C and 47 °C). The instantaneous (elastic), and time-dependent viscoelastic, and viscoplastic compliance profiles of the materials were determined and analyzed as a function of materials and temperature. Results: Highly significant (p = 0.0001) differences among means of elastic, viscoelastic and viscoplastic compliance values were found as a function of materials. TRIM II showed an order of magnitude higher viscoplastic deformation than the other three materials (LUXATEMP, PROTEMP 3 GARANT and JET). Conclusions: The results indicate that PEMA is susceptible to significantly greater elastic, viscoelastic, and more importantly to viscoplastic compliant behavior compared with bisacryl composite and PMMA provisional crown and bridge materials. This indicates high-dimensional instability and poor stiffness and resiliency in PEMA appliances vis-à-vis those of PMMA and bisacryl composites.

Keywords

• Creep–recovery tests
• elastic
• viscoelastic and viscoplastic contributions to compliance
• temporization materials