Scientific Reports (Nov 2022)

Microdamage analysis of single-use flexible ureteroscope immediately after lithotripsy use

  • Teruaki Sugino,
  • Kazumi Taguchi,
  • Rei Unno,
  • Shuzo Hamamoto,
  • Ryosuke Ando,
  • Atsushi Okada,
  • Takahiro Yasui

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-23345-z
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 12, no. 1
pp. 1 – 6

Abstract

Read online

Abstract This prospective ex vivo study investigated microdamage to single-use flexible ureteroscopes (fURS) after ureteroscopy and endoscopic combined intrarenal surgery (ECIRS). The performance of 30 WiScope devices (OTU Medical, San Jose, CA, USA) was examined immediately after use, dividing them into three equal groups: ureteroscopy and ECIRS in the prone and supine positions. The overall scope of microdamage assessment included the scope deflection, bending radius, resolution, and water flow rate. Additionally, we analyzed the association between scope status and surgical parameters. The deflection, bending radius, and resolution remained similarly above the thresholds in all groups. However, the water flow rate was below the threshold in seven scopes (70%) in the ureteroscopy group and none in the ECIRS groups (P = 0.001). Univariate and multivariable logistic regression analyses demonstrated that basket wire catheter use was associated with an increased risk for overall scope microdamage (odds ratio [OR], 22.70; P = 0.006 and OR, 22.40; P = 0.019, respectively). Stone size, total laser energy, and surgical position were not associated with a risk for scope microdamage. In conclusion, ureteroscopy was more closely associated with scope damage than ECIRS, and basket wire catheter use seemed to inflict more damage to the fURS.