Journal of Hydrology X (Dec 2022)
Assessing the influence of calibration methodology and model structure on glacio-hydrological simulations in the Cheakamus River Basin, British Columbia, Canada
Abstract
As glaciers across the world continue to recede, there is a concern that their loss as a fresh water reservoir within mountainous basins will have a negative impact on stream temperatures and downstream water resources. Currently, there are relatively few glacio-hydrological models (GHMs) appropriate to study such phenomena and studies that have used GHMs generally acknowledge the high uncertainty associated with their simulations. Calibration techniques present a particular issue in GHMs as available glacier observations are limited and errors in the glacierized portion of a basin can be compensated by errors in the non-glacierized portion. Using as a study site the Cheakamus Basin in British Columbia, Canada, we 1) present a new, fully-coupled GHM, 2) analyze the effects different calibration techniques have on the model’s summer streamflow projections, and 3) compare the fully-coupled GHM results to projections using a one-way GHM. The calibration techniques studied vary in terms of glacier representation (dynamic/static), and glacier constraint (mass balance/thinning rates/thinning rates and area change). We find projected future climate forcings are sufficiently strong in the Cheakamus Basin so as to generally make the sign and significance of changes to the basin’s hydrology insensitive to the calibration and projection procedures studied. However, the variation among these procedures produces significant changes in the projected magnitude of future hydrological changes and therefore should be carefully considered in studies where precision beyond the sign and significance of change is required. Based on analysis of the variation within each procedure’s set of model outputs, we conclude 1) the two-way GHM has benefits over the one-way model, 2) calibration using dynamic glaciers and a thinning rate constraint is preferable for the new GHM, and 3) there is a need for additional studies on the uncertainties associated with the calibration of glacio-hydrological models.
