JCO Global Oncology (Nov 2020)

Comparison of Definitive Cervical Cancer Management With Chemotherapy and Radiation Between Two Centers With Variable Resources and Opportunities for Improved Treatment

  • Francis Adumata Asamoah,
  • Joel Yarney,
  • Aba Scott,
  • Verna Vanderpuye,
  • Zhigang Yuan,
  • Daniel C. Fernandez,
  • Michael E. Montejo,
  • Mervin Agyeman,
  • Samuel Ntiamoah Boateng,
  • Kwabena Anarfi,
  • Charles Aidoo,
  • Mian M. Shahzad,
  • Jing-Yi Chern,
  • Hye-Sook Chon,
  • Robert M. Wenham,
  • Kosj Yamoah,
  • Kamran A. Ahmed

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1200/GO.20.00303
Journal volume & issue
no. 6
pp. 1510 – 1518

Abstract

Read online

PURPOSECervical cancer remains a major health challenge in low- to middle-income countries. We present the experiences of two centers practicing in variable resource environments to determine predictors of improved radiochemotherapy treatment.METHODS AND MATERIALSThis comparative review describes cervical cancer presentation and treatment with concurrent chemoradiotherapy with high-dose-rate brachytherapy between 2014 and 2017 at the National Radiotherapy Oncology and Nuclear Medicine Center (NRONMC) in Korle-Bu Teaching Hospital, Accra, Ghana, and Moffitt Cancer Center (MCC), Tampa, FL.RESULTSMedian follow-up for this study was 16.9 months. NRONMC patients presented with predominantly stage III disease (42% v 16%; P = .002). MCC patients received para-aortic node irradiation (16%) and interstitial brachytherapy implants (19%). Median treatment duration was longer for NRONMC patients compared with MCC patients (59 v 52 days; P < .0001), and treatment duration ≥ 55 days predicted worse survival on multivariable analysis (MVA; P = .02). Stage ≥ III disease predicted poorer local control on MVA. There was a difference in local control among patients with stage III disease (58% v 91%; P = .03) but not in survival between MCC and NRONMC. No significant difference in local control was observed for stage IB, IIA, and IIB disease.CONCLUSIONAlthough there were significant differences in disease presentation between the two centers, treatment outcomes were similar for patients with early-stage disease. Longer treatment duration and stage ≥ III disease predicted poor outcomes.