Applied Sciences (May 2022)

Maxillary Skeletal Expansion with Monocortical and Bicortical Miniscrew Anchorage: A 3D Finite Element Study

  • Pao-Hsin Liu,
  • Yu-Feng Chen,
  • Chin-Yun Pan,
  • Ming-Hsuan Sheen,
  • Bang-Sia Chen,
  • Hong-Po Chang

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/app12094621
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 12, no. 9
p. 4621

Abstract

Read online

The aim of the present study is to use a 3D finite element analysis to investigate and compare the transverse displacement and stress distribution between stainless steel miniscrews and titanium alloy miniscrews used for monocortical and bicortical anchorage during miniscrew-assisted rapid maxillary expansions. Skull models were constructed to depict expansion after and before midpalatal suture opening at varying miniscrew insertion depths in four clinical scenarios: monocortical, monocortical deepening, bicortical, and bicortical deepening. Finite element analyses of miniscrew properties, including transverse displacement and von Mises stress distribution, were performed for each clinical scenario. Peri-implant stress was lesser in both bicortical anchorage models compared to both monocortical models. Transverse displacement in the coronal and axial planes was also greater and more parallel in both bicortical models compared to both monocortical models. Transverse displacement and peri-implant stress did not significantly differ between monocortical and monocortical deepening models or between bicortical and bicortical deepening models. From a biomechanical perspective, the bicortical deepening miniscrew anchorage is preferable to monocortical and monocortical deepening anchorage, because bicortical anchorage induces less stress on the peri-implant bone. Consequently, bicortical deepening anchorage should be considered the preferred option in challenging clinical scenarios in which strong anchorage is required for maxillary skeletal expansion.

Keywords