BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making (Jan 2024)

Development of a mobile application to represent food intake in inpatients: dietary data systematization

  • Alan Renier Jamal Occhioni Molter,
  • Naise Oliveira da Rocha Carvalho,
  • Paloma Ribeiro Torres,
  • Marlete Pereira da Silva,
  • Patrícia Dias de Brito,
  • Pedro Emmanuel Alvarenga Americano do Brasil,
  • Claudio Fico Fonseca,
  • Adriana Costa Bacelo

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12911-023-02406-x
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 24, no. 1
pp. 1 – 10

Abstract

Read online

Abstract Background Nutritional risk situations related to decreased food intake in the hospital environment hinder nutritional care and increase malnutrition in hospitalized patients and are often associated with increased morbidity and mortality. The objective of this study is to develop and test the reliability and data similarity of a mobile application as a virtual instrument to assess the acceptability and quality of hospital diets for inpatients. Methods This intra- and interobserver development and reliability study investigated an in-hospital food intake monitoring application based on a validated instrument for patients with infectious diseases who were treated at the Evandro Chagas National Institute of Infectious Diseases (INI/FIOCRUZ). The instrument was sequentially administered to patients 48 h after admission to INI hospital units using the printed instrument (paper) and the digital application (ARIETI) simultaneously. The tested reliability factor was the consistency of the method in the digital platform, checking whether the application provided equivalent data to the paper instrument, and finally, a statistical analysis plan was performed in the R platform version 4.2.0. This project was authorized by the FIOCRUZ/INI Research Ethics Committee. Results The ARIETI was developed and tested for reliability in 70 participants, showing a similar ability to calculate caloric intake in Kcal, protein intake (g), the proportion of caloric intake and protein intake relative to the prescribed goal. These instrument comparison analyses showed statistical significance (p < 0.001). The application was superior to the paper-based instrument, accelerating the time to perform the nutritional risk diagnosis based on food intake by approximately 250 s (average time). Conclusions The ARIETI application has demonstrated equivalent reliability compared to the original instrument. Moreover, it optimized the time between the diagnosis of nutritional risk related to dietary intake and the nutritionist’s decision making, showing an improved ability to maintain information quality compared to the paper-based instrument.

Keywords