In Autumn 2020, DOAJ will be relaunching with a new website with updated functionality, improved search, and a simplified application form. More information is available on our blog. Our API is also changing.

Hide this message

Paths in contemporary economics and sciences of artificial intelligence that originate from Simon’s bounded rationality approach

PSL Quarterly Review. 2017;70(280):7-33 DOI 10.13133/2037-3643_70.280_2

 

Journal Homepage

Journal Title: PSL Quarterly Review

ISSN: 2037-3635 (Print); 2037-3643 (Online)

Publisher: Associazione Economia civile

Society/Institution: Associazione Economia civile

LCC Subject Category: Political science | Social Sciences: Economic theory. Demography

Country of publisher: Italy

Language of fulltext: English

Full-text formats available: PDF

 

AUTHORS


Massimo Egidi

EDITORIAL INFORMATION

Blind peer review

Editorial Board

Instructions for authors

Time From Submission to Publication: 20 weeks

 

Abstract | Full Text

Based on the work of Herbert A. Simon, the author critically reflects on the past and current state of crucial behavioural assumptions such as rational expectations and bounded rationality. Simon recognized that the core of every organization is the pattern underlying the division of tasks and their coordination: behaviour within organizations is oriented toward goals, and goals are generally complex and hierarchical. Many intermediate sub-goals must be realized in a specific order for the final goal to be achieved. Additionally, the dynamics of organizational decisions are very complex and have two relevant aspects. First, goals are often defined in very general and ambiguous ways, thus necessitating revision of the sub-goals’ hierarchy. Second, many hidden conflicting objectives can be discovered during organizational decisions, when, again, a revision of the sub-goals and their hierarchy may become necessary. It is easy to see that, with this analytical setup, the classical theme of division of labour and coordination would dominate the scenario, leaving utility theory behind. JEL codes: B21, D03, D81