PLoS ONE (Jan 2021)

Impact of stent edge dissection detected by optical coherence tomography after current-generation drug-eluting stent implantation.

  • Hiroyuki Jinnouchi,
  • Kenichi Sakakura,
  • Tomonobu Yanase,
  • Yusuke Ugata,
  • Takunori Tsukui,
  • Yosuke Taniguchi,
  • Kei Yamamoto,
  • Masaru Seguchi,
  • Hiroshi Wada,
  • Hideo Fujita

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0259693
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 16, no. 11
p. e0259693

Abstract

Read online

BackgroundStent edge dissection (SED) is a well-known predictor of worse clinical outcomes. However, impact of SED after current-generation drug-eluting stent (DES) implantation remains unknown since there was no study using only current-generation DES to assess impact of SED. This study aimed to investigate a relationship between SED detected by optical coherence tomography (OCT) and clinical outcomes after current-generation DES implantation.MethodsThis study enrolled 175 patients receiving OCT after current-generation DES implantation. The SED group was compared with the non-SED group in terms of the primary study endpoints which was the cumulative incidence of major adverse cardiac event (MACE) composed of cardiac death, target vessel myocardial infarction (TV-MI), and clinically-driven target lesion revascularization (CD-TLR).ResultsOf 175 patients, SED detected by OCT was observed in 32 patients, while 143 patients did not show SED. In the crude population, the SED group showed a significantly higher incidence of CD-TLR, definite stent thrombosis, TV-MI and cardiac death relative to the non-SED group. After adjustment by an inverse probability weighted methods, the SED group showed a significantly higher incidence of MACE compared with the non-SED group (hazard ratio 3.43, 95% confidence interval 1.09-10.81, p = 0.035). Fibrocalcific or lipidic plaques, greater lumen eccentricity, and stent-oversizing were the predictors of SED.ConclusionsSED detected by OCT after the current-generation DES implantation led to unfavorable outcomes. Aggressive post-dilatation around the stent edge might worse clinical outcomes due to SED, although achievement of optimal stent expansion is strongly encouraged to improve clinical outcomes.