Lithosphere (Jan 2024)

Polyphase Exhumation of the East Kunlun Orogenic Belt: Evidence from Modern River Detrital Zircon and Apatite Fission Track Dating

  • Yuxiong Ma,
  • Zhao Yang,
  • Dengfeng He,
  • Xiaohui Shi,
  • Bo Zhou,
  • Jiali You,
  • Dali Ju,
  • Yunpeng Dong

DOI
https://doi.org/10.2113/2023/lithosphere_2023_259
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 2023, no. Special 14

Abstract

Read online

The East Kunlun Orogenic Belt (E-KOB) stands out as one of the most prominent basin-mountain geomorphic features in the northern interior of the Tibetan Plateau. It records a series of accretion-collision events from the Mesozoic to the Cenozoic. In particular, with the uplifting of the Tibetan Plateau, the E-KOB experienced intracontinental deformation and exhumation in the Cenozoic. Clarifying the exhumation history of the E-KOB is crucial to define the growth time and mechanism of the Tibetan Plateau. In this study, we apply detrital zircon fission-track (ZFT) and apatite fission-track (AFT) analyses on modern river sands in order to constrain the regional exhumation history of the eastern E-KOB. Four peak ages have been identified and interpreted as results of rapid exhumation correlated with intracontinental deformation. Two older peak ages at 144.7–141.0 and 114.6–82.1 Ma are in good accordance with the collision time of the north-south Lhasa-Qiangtang Block along the Bangong-Nujiang suture zone and the subsequent progressive deformation stage toward the north. Peak age at 60.9–45.3 Ma is coeval with the initial timing of the India-Asia collision. The youngest peak age at 25.1–18.3 Ma matches well with the extensive outward and upward growth of the Tibetan Plateau during the Oligocene to Miocene time. The Cretaceous and early Cenozoic rapid exhumations suggest that the E-KOB has been involved in the intracontinental deformation induced by collisions of the Lhasa-Qiangtang and India-Asia from the south. It implies that the northern Tibetan Plateau likely has been elevated or was a structural high before the Eocene. In addition, some of our detrital samples show a younger ZFT peak age than the AFT peak age. We attributed this data bias to the contribution of hydrodynamic sorting and/or lithological difference. The combination of ZFT and AFT dating has advantages in eliminating interfering age signals in detrital thermochronology.