Virology Journal (Apr 2005)

Comparison of amplification enzymes for Hepatitis C Virus quasispecies analysis

  • Bonkovsky Herbert L,
  • Lindsay Karen L,
  • Shuhart Margaret C,
  • Dai James Y,
  • Austin Michael A,
  • Sullivan Daniel G,
  • Polyak Stephen J,
  • Di Bisceglie Adrian M,
  • Lee William M,
  • Morishima Chihiro,
  • Gretch David R

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/1743-422X-2-41
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 2, no. 1
p. 41

Abstract

Read online

Abstract Background Hepatitis C virus (HCV) circulates as quasispecies (QS), whose evolution is associated with pathogenesis. Previous studies have suggested that the use of thermostable polymerases without proofreading function may contribute to inaccurate assessment of HCV QS. In this report, we compared non-proofreading (Taq) with proofreading (Advantage High Fidelity-2; HF-2) polymerases in the sensitivity, robustness, and HCV QS diversity and complexity in the second envelope glycoprotein gene hypervariable region 1 (E2-HVR1) on baseline specimens from 20 patients in the HALT-C trial and in a small cohort of 12 HCV/HIV co-infected patients. QS diversity and complexity were quantified using heteroduplex mobility assays (HMA). Results The sensitivities of both enzymes were comparable at 50 IU/ml, although HF-2 was more robust and slightly more sensitive than Taq. Both enzymes generated QS diversity and complexity scores that were correlated (r = 0.68; p Conclusion The data suggest that while Taq may overestimate HCV QS complexity, its use does not significantly affect results in cohort-based studies of HCV QS analyzed by HMA. However, the use of proofreading enzymes such as HF-2 is recommended for more accurate characterization of HCV QS in vivo.

Keywords