Insights into Imaging (Feb 2020)
Image-guided breast biopsy and localisation: recommendations for information to women and referring physicians by the European Society of Breast Imaging
- Ulrich Bick,
- Rubina M. Trimboli,
- Alexandra Athanasiou,
- Corinne Balleyguier,
- Pascal A. T. Baltzer,
- Maria Bernathova,
- Krisztina Borbély,
- Boris Brkljacic,
- Luca A. Carbonaro,
- Paola Clauser,
- Enrico Cassano,
- Catherine Colin,
- Gul Esen,
- Andrew Evans,
- Eva M. Fallenberg,
- Michael H. Fuchsjaeger,
- Fiona J. Gilbert,
- Thomas H. Helbich,
- Sylvia H. Heywang-Köbrunner,
- Michel Herranz,
- Karen Kinkel,
- Fleur Kilburn-Toppin,
- Christiane K. Kuhl,
- Mihai Lesaru,
- Marc B. I. Lobbes,
- Ritse M. Mann,
- Laura Martincich,
- Pietro Panizza,
- Federica Pediconi,
- Ruud M. Pijnappel,
- Katja Pinker,
- Simone Schiaffino,
- Tamar Sella,
- Isabelle Thomassin-Naggara,
- Anne Tardivon,
- Chantal Van Ongeval,
- Matthew G. Wallis,
- Sophia Zackrisson,
- Gabor Forrai,
- Julia Camps Herrero,
- Francesco Sardanelli,
- for the European Society of Breast Imaging (EUSOBI), with language review by Europa Donna–The European Breast Cancer Coalition
Affiliations
- Ulrich Bick
- Clinic of Radiology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin
- Rubina M. Trimboli
- PhD Course in Integrative Biomedical Research, Department of Biomedical Science for Health, Università degli Studi di Milano
- Alexandra Athanasiou
- Breast Imaging Department, MITERA Hospital
- Corinne Balleyguier
- Department of Radiology, Gustave-Roussy Cancer Campus
- Pascal A. T. Baltzer
- Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image-guided Therapy, Division of Molecular and Gender Imaging, Medical University of Vienna
- Maria Bernathova
- Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image-guided Therapy, Division of Molecular and Gender Imaging, Medical University of Vienna
- Krisztina Borbély
- MH EK Honvédkórház
- Boris Brkljacic
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Dubrava, University of Zagreb School of Medicine
- Luca A. Carbonaro
- Unit of Radiology, IRCCS Policlinico San Donato
- Paola Clauser
- Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image-guided Therapy, Division of Molecular and Gender Imaging, Medical University of Vienna
- Enrico Cassano
- Breast Imaging Division, European Institute of Oncology
- Catherine Colin
- Radiology Unit, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Centre Hospitalo-Universitaire Femme Mère Enfant
- Gul Esen
- School of Medicine, Department of Radiology, Acıbadem Mehmet Ali Aydınlar University
- Andrew Evans
- Dundee Cancer Centre, Clinical Research Centre, Ninewells Hospital and Medical School
- Eva M. Fallenberg
- Diagnostic and Interventional Breast Imaging, Department of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich
- Michael H. Fuchsjaeger
- Division of General Radiology, Department of Radiology, Medical University Graz
- Fiona J. Gilbert
- Department of Radiology, University of Cambridge
- Thomas H. Helbich
- Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image-guided Therapy, Division of Molecular and Gender Imaging, Medical University of Vienna
- Sylvia H. Heywang-Köbrunner
- Referenzzentrum Mammographie München and FFB gGmbH München
- Michel Herranz
- CyclotronUnit, GALARIA-SERGAS, Nuclear Medicine Department and Molecular ImagingGroup, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria (IDIS)
- Karen Kinkel
- Institut de Radiologie, Clinique des Grangettes
- Fleur Kilburn-Toppin
- Department of Radiology, University of Cambridge
- Christiane K. Kuhl
- University Hospital of Aachen, Rheinisch-Westfälische Technische Hochschule
- Mihai Lesaru
- Radiology and Imaging Laboratory, Fundeni Institute
- Marc B. I. Lobbes
- Department of Radiology, Zuyderland Medical Center
- Ritse M. Mann
- Department of Radiology, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre
- Laura Martincich
- Unit of Radiodiagnostics ASL AT
- Pietro Panizza
- Breast Imaging Unit, Scientific Institute (IRCCS) Ospedale San Raffaele
- Federica Pediconi
- Department of Radiological, Oncological and Pathological Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome
- Ruud M. Pijnappel
- Department of Imaging, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht University
- Katja Pinker
- Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image-guided Therapy, Division of Molecular and Gender Imaging, Medical University of Vienna
- Simone Schiaffino
- Unit of Radiology, IRCCS Policlinico San Donato
- Tamar Sella
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Hadassah Hebrew University Medical Center
- Isabelle Thomassin-Naggara
- Department of Radiology, Sorbonne Université, APHP
- Anne Tardivon
- Department of Radiology, Institut Curie
- Chantal Van Ongeval
- Department of Radiology, University Hospitals Leuven
- Matthew G. Wallis
- Cambridge Breast Unit and NIHR Biomedical Research Unit, Box 97, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
- Sophia Zackrisson
- Diagnostic Radiology, Department of Translational Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Lund University, Skåne University Hospital Malmö
- Gabor Forrai
- Department of Radiology, Duna Medical Center
- Julia Camps Herrero
- Jefa Corporativa del Área de la Mama, Ribera Salud Grupo
- Francesco Sardanelli
- Unit of Radiology, IRCCS Policlinico San Donato
- for the European Society of Breast Imaging (EUSOBI), with language review by Europa Donna–The European Breast Cancer Coalition
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1186/s13244-019-0803-x
- Journal volume & issue
-
Vol. 11,
no. 1
pp. 1 – 18
Abstract
Abstract We summarise here the information to be provided to women and referring physicians about percutaneous breast biopsy and lesion localisation under imaging guidance. After explaining why a preoperative diagnosis with a percutaneous biopsy is preferred to surgical biopsy, we illustrate the criteria used by radiologists for choosing the most appropriate combination of device type for sampling and imaging technique for guidance. Then, we describe the commonly used devices, from fine-needle sampling to tissue biopsy with larger needles, namely core needle biopsy and vacuum-assisted biopsy, and how mammography, digital breast tomosynthesis, ultrasound, or magnetic resonance imaging work for targeting the lesion for sampling or localisation. The differences among the techniques available for localisation (carbon marking, metallic wire, radiotracer injection, radioactive seed, and magnetic seed localisation) are illustrated. Type and rate of possible complications are described and the issue of concomitant antiplatelet or anticoagulant therapy is also addressed. The importance of pathological-radiological correlation is highlighted: when evaluating the results of any needle sampling, the radiologist must check the concordance between the cytology/pathology report of the sample and the radiological appearance of the biopsied lesion. We recommend that special attention is paid to a proper and tactful approach when communicating to the woman the need for tissue sampling as well as the possibility of cancer diagnosis, repeat tissue sampling, and or even surgery when tissue sampling shows a lesion with uncertain malignant potential (also referred to as “high-risk” or B3 lesions). Finally, seven frequently asked questions are answered.
Keywords