A modified Aquila optimizer algorithm for optimization energy-efficient no-idle permutation flow shop scheduling problem

Abstract

Increasing energy consumption has faced challenges and pressures for modern manufacturing operations. The production sector accounts for half of the world's total energy consumption. Reducing idle machine time by em­ploying No-Idle Permutation Flow Shop Scheduling (NIPFSP) is one of the best decisions for reducing energy consumption. This article modifies one of the energy consumption-solving algorithms, the Aquila Optimizer (AO) algo­rithm. This research contributes by 1) proposing novel AO procedures for solving energy consumption problems with NIPFSP and 2) expanding the literature on metaheuristic algorithms that can solve energy consumption problems with NIPFSP. To analyze whether the AO algorithm is optimal, we compared by using the Grey Wolf Optimizer (GWO) algorithm. It com­pares these two algorithms to tackle the problem of energy consumption by testing four distinct problems. Comparison of the AO and GWO algorithm is thirty times for each case for each population and iteration. The outcome of comparing the two algorithms is using a t-test on independent samples and ECR. In all case studies, the results demonstrate that the AO algorithm has a lower energy consumption value than GWO. The AO algorithm is there­fore recommended for minimizing energy consumption because it can produce more optimal results than the comparison algorithm.

Keywords

• aquila optimizer (ao)
• consumption energy
• flow shop
• no idle