Life (Aug 2023)

Evaluation of Rapid Multiplex Reverse Transcription-Quantitative Polymerase Chain Reaction Assays for SARS-CoV-2 Detection in Individual and Pooled Samples

  • Young-Hyun Baek,
  • Min-Young Park,
  • Ho-Jae Lim,
  • Dong-Jae Youm,
  • Youngshin You,
  • Seojin Ahn,
  • Jung-Eun Park,
  • Min-Jin Kim,
  • Sun-Hwa Lee,
  • Yong-Hak Sohn,
  • Yong-Jin Yang

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/life13081717
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 13, no. 8
p. 1717

Abstract

Read online

Although coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is no longer a Public Health Emergency of International Concern (PHEIC), severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection has had a vast impact to date. Hence, continuous management is required, given the uncertainty caused by the potential evolution of SARS-CoV-2. Reverse transcription-quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR) diagnosis has been fundamental in overcoming this issue. In this study, the performances of two rapid RT-qPCR assays (Real-Q Direct SARS-CoV-2 Detection Kit and Allplex™ SARS-CoV-2 fast PCR Assay) with short PCR times were comparatively evaluated using a STANDARD M nCoV Real-Time Detection Kit (STANDARD M, conventional RT-qPCR assay). All kits showed a limit of detection values (102–103 copies/reaction). The evaluation showed that the two rapid assay tests had ≥97.89% sensitivity and ≥99.51% specificity (κ = 0.98) for individual samples and ≥97.32% sensitivity and ≥97.67% specificity for pooled samples compared to STANDARD M. These results indicate that the two rapid RT-qPCR kits, which showed significant time reduction in performance, are as effective as a conventional RT-qPCR assay. They are likely to increase not only the number of tests that can be performed but also the efficiency of sustainable management of COVID-19 in the long term.

Keywords