Вестник хирургии имени И.И. Грекова (Jan 2018)

ADVANTAGES AND DISADVANTAGES OF WARFARIN AND PRADAXA THERAPY FOR VENOUS THROMBOEMBOLISM

  • B. S. Sukovatykh,
  • L. N. Belikov,
  • O. F. Savchuk,
  • M. B. Sukovatykh

DOI
https://doi.org/10.24884/0042-4625-2014-173-4-87-91
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 173, no. 4
pp. 87 – 91

Abstract

Read online

An analysis of complex examination of 110 patients with venous thromboembolism was made. The patients were separated into 2 groups. The first group included 60 patients, who had the start heparin therapy during 7 days with the following 6-month warfarin therapy. Warfarin was substituted by pradaxa (dabigatran) for 50 patients of the second group. The efficacy of pradaxa could be compared with warfarin. However, pradaxa had a number of advantages such as the predictable anticoagulant effect, standard dosages. This medicine is more predictable and doesn’t require a control of homeostasis and an adjustment of drug dosage.

Keywords