Journal of Infection and Public Health (Sep 2023)

Outcome of patients with carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii infections treated with cefiderocol: A multicenter observational study

  • Federica Calò,
  • Lorenzo Onorato,
  • Ilaria De Luca,
  • Margherita Macera,
  • Caterina Monari,
  • Emanuele Durante-Mangoni,
  • Alessia Massa,
  • Ivan Gentile,
  • Giovanni Di Caprio,
  • Pasquale Pagliano,
  • Fabio Giuliano Numis,
  • Pasquale Iuliano,
  • Antonio Riccardo Buonomo,
  • Sebastiano Leone,
  • Paolo Maggi,
  • Nicola Coppola

Journal volume & issue
Vol. 16, no. 9
pp. 1485 – 1491

Abstract

Read online

Background: No clear evidence supports the use of cefiderocol as first line treatment in A. baumannii infections. Methods: We conducted an observational retrospective/prospective multicenter study including all patients> 18 years with carbapenem-resistant A. baumannii (CRAB) infections treated with cefiderocol, from June 12021 to October 30 2022. Primary endpoint was 30-day mortality, secondary end-points the clinical and microbiological response at 7 days and at the end of treatment. Furthermore, we compared the clinical and microbiological outcomes among patients who received cefiderocol in monotherapy or in combination. Results: Thirty-eight patients with forty episodes of infection were included [mean age 65 years (SD+16.3), 75% males, 90% with hospital-acquired infections and 70% showing sepsis or septic shock]. The most common infections included unknown source or catheter-related bacteremia (45%) and pneumonia (40%). We observed at 7 days and at the end of therapy a rate of microbiological failure of 20% and 10%, respectively, and of clinical failure of 47.5% and 32.5%, respectively; the 30-day mortality rate was 47.5%. At multivariate analysis clinical failure at 7 days of treatment was the only independent predictor of 30-day mortality. Comparing monotherapy (used in 72.5%) vs. combination therapy (used in 27.5%), no differences were observed in mortality (51.7 vs 45.5%) and clinical (41.4 vs 63.7%) or microbiological failure (24.1 vs 9.1%). Conclusions: The findings of this study reinforce the effectiveness of cefiderocol in CRAB infections, also as monotherapy. However, prospective multicenter studies with larger sample sizes and a control group treated with standard of care are needed to identify the best treatment for CRAB infections.

Keywords