Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (Jun 2024)

Complications of Mastoid Surgery: A Descriptive Study from a Tertiary Care Centre, Assam, India

  • Mousumi Modhumita Agarwala,
  • Debajit Sarma,
  • Manaswi Sharma,
  • Rupanjita Sangma,
  • Dhritiman Dey

DOI
https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2024/67833.19528
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 18, no. 06
pp. 01 – 04

Abstract

Read online

Introduction: Mastoidectomy is a surgical procedure that removes infection, along with cholesteatoma, from the mastoid and middle ear. Cholesteatoma, a progressive disease that erodes bone when left untreated, leads to complications. Aim: To ascertain the most common mastoidectomy-related intraoperative and postoperative complications. Materials and Methods: This study was a retrospective descriptive study of patients who underwent mastoidectomy over one year at a tertiary care hospital in Assam, India between April 2022 to March 2023. All the patients planned for mastoidectomy were evaluated for intraoperative complications like facial nerve injury or postoperative complications immediately after the postoperative period (e.g., wound dehiscence) or between 1-3 months (e.g., Sensorineural Hearing Loss (SNHL), dead ear, etc.). The data collected was tabulated in a Microsoft Excel Worksheet, and the categorical variables were summarised as proportions and percentages. Results: A total of 62 patients underwent mastoidectomy and were reviewed over the one-year period retrospectively. Out of these, 28 (45.16%) developed complications. Two out of 62 patients (3.2%) experienced facial nerve injury intraoperatively. One patient (1.6%) with a high jugular bulb experienced massive bleeding intraoperatively while raising the tympanomeatal flap. Labyrinthine injury, dural plate injury, and sigmoid sinus injury were each found in one patient (1.6%). Eight out of 62 patients (12.9%) developed persistent otorrhea. Additionally, five patients (8%) had wound dehiscence and were treated with antibacterials, antiseptic dressing, and secondary suturing when needed. Two patients (3.2%) experienced SNHL; preoperatively, they had mild conductive hearing loss which postoperatively converted to mild to moderate mixed hearing loss. Postoperative dead ear was observed in one patient (1.6%). There was one patient (1.6%) with an unfavourably displaced pinna, and two patients (3.2%) had recurrent cholesteatoma. Vertigo was seen in two cases of radical mastoidectomy and one case of modified radical mastoidectomy. Conclusion: With proper planning and sound surgical techniques, avoidance of mastoidectomy complications can be achieved.

Keywords