Open Access Rheumatology: Research and Reviews (Dec 2019)

Clinical Improvements as Predictors of Improvements in Patient-Reported Outcomes: Post Hoc Analysis of a Randomized, Open-Label Study of Etanercept in Latin American Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis

  • Guerra Bautista G,
  • Xavier RM,
  • de la Vega M,
  • Simón-Campos JA,
  • Solano G,
  • Pedersen RD,
  • Vlahos B,
  • Borlenghi C

Journal volume & issue
Vol. Volume 11
pp. 275 – 281

Abstract

Read online

Generoso Guerra Bautista,1 Ricardo Machado Xavier,2 Maria de la Vega,3 J Abraham Simón-Campos,4 Gastón Solano,5 Ronald D Pedersen,6 Bonnie Vlahos,6 Cecilia Borlenghi7 1Centro de Investigación Marbella, Paitilla Panamá, Panamá; 2Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, Porto Alegre, Brazil; 3CEIM Investigaciones Medicas, Buenos Aires, Argentina; 4Köhler & Milstein Research, Mérida, México; 5Pfizer, San José, Costa Rica; 6Pfizer, Collegeville, PA, USA; 7Pfizer, Buenos Aires, ArgentinaCorrespondence: Generoso Guerra BautistaConsultorios Royal Center, Calle 53 Marbella, Panamá, República de PanamáTel +507-263-3283Email [email protected]: In rheumatoid arthritis (RA), little is known about clinical responses to treatment as predictors of patient-reported outcome (PRO) changes. In this post hoc analysis, we examined the relationship between clinical outcomes at week 12 and PRO changes at week 24 in patients with RA.Methods: In an open-label study, Latin American patients with moderate-to-severe RA and an inadequate response to methotrexate (MTX) were randomized to receive etanercept 50 mg/week plus MTX (ETN+MTX; n=281) or an additional conventional disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug (DMARD) plus MTX (DMARD+MTX; n=142) for 24 weeks. The PROs included Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI), 36-item Short Form (SF-36), Physician and Patient Global Assessment scores (PGA, PtGA), Physician and Patient Satisfaction, and an activity impairment assessment. PRO changes at week 24 were calculated by week-12 improvements using the American College of Rheumatology criteria (ACR <20, ≥20 to <50, ≥50 to <70, and ≥70) and the 28-joint Disease Activity Scores (DAS28 ≥3.2, ≥2.6 to <3.2, and <2.6). Observed-cases data were analyzed using an ANCOVA model with linear contrast, adjusted for baseline PRO and ACR/DAS28 values.Results: For both ETN+MTX- and DMARD+MTX-treated patients, there was a significant linear trend between week-12 changes in ACR and DAS28 responses and week-24 changes in HAQ-DI (P<0.001 for all), with numerical improvements generally favoring ETN+MTX. Similar relationships were observed for SF-36, PGA, PtGA, Physician Satisfaction, Patient Satisfaction, and activity impairment. Conclusions: In patients with RA, clinical response after 12 weeks of treatment with ETN+MTX or DMARD+MTX could be a predictor of week-24 response for several PROs.Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT00848354.Keywords: etanercept, rheumatoid arthritis, clinical outcome, patient-reported outcome, predictor

Keywords