Ophthalmology and Therapy (Jul 2024)

Travoprost Intracameral Implant Demonstrates Superior IOP Lowering Versus Topical Prostaglandin Analog Monotherapy in Patients with Open-Angle Glaucoma or Ocular Hypertension

  • Jason Bacharach,
  • Long V. Doan,
  • Kerry G. Stephens,
  • Dale W. Usner,
  • Angela C. Kothe,
  • L. Jay Katz,
  • Tomas Navratil

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40123-024-00992-1
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 13, no. 9
pp. 2357 – 2367

Abstract

Read online

Abstract Introduction This study was conducted to analyze and compare the intraocular pressure (IOP) treatment effect of the slow-eluting (SE) travoprost intracameral implant to the IOP treatment effect of topical prostaglandin analog (PGA) monotherapy in a subgroup of subjects who were on pre-study PGA monotherapy prior to enrollment in the two pivotal phase 3 trials of the travoprost intracameral implant. Methods A combined study population of 133 subjects from two phase 3 trials, who were on topical PGA monotherapy at screening, subsequently underwent a washout period from their topical PGA, and then were randomized and administered an SE travoprost intracameral implant. The subjects were analyzed for the IOP treatment effects of the pre-study topical PGA monotherapy and the in-study SE travoprost intracameral implant. Paired t-tests were used to compare the difference in screening minus post-washout baseline IOP versus month 3 minus post-washout baseline IOP. The IOP-lowering efficacy in eyes administered an SE travoprost intracameral implant was compared to the IOP lowering in the same eyes while on a topical PGA monotherapy prior to study entry. Results Pre-study topical PGA monotherapy and the SE travoprost intracameral implant demonstrated IOP treatment effects of −5.76 mmHg and −7.07 mmHg, respectively. The IOP-lowering treatment effect was significantly greater by 1.31 mmHg for the SE travoprost intracameral implant relative to pre-study PGA monotherapy (95% confidence interval: −2.01, −0.60; P = 0.0003). Conclusions The SE travoprost intracameral implant demonstrated superior IOP-lowering treatment effect versus pre-study topical PGA monotherapy with a superiority margin that was both statistically significant and clinically meaningful. The greater IOP reduction from baseline while on the SE implant versus pre-study topical PGA monotherapy may be a reflection of the optimized adherence and continuous elution of PGA therapy into the anterior chamber achieved with the SE travoprost intracameral implant. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov identifiers, NCT03519386 and NCT03868124.

Keywords