Frontiers in Pharmacology (Nov 2020)

Safety and Efficacy of Adjunctive Therapy With Artesunate in the Treatment of Severe Malaria: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

  • Yuanyuan Zou,
  • Fei Tuo,
  • Zhiqi Zhang,
  • Jiawen Guo,
  • Yueming Yuan,
  • Yueming Yuan,
  • Hongying Zhang,
  • Zhiyong Xu,
  • Ziyi Pan,
  • Yexiao Tang,
  • Changsheng Deng,
  • Nadia Julie,
  • Wanting Wu,
  • Wenfeng Guo,
  • Changqing Li,
  • Xinan Huang,
  • Qin Xu,
  • Jianping Song,
  • Qi Wang

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2020.596697
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 11

Abstract

Read online

Objective: The purpose of this meta-analysis of longitudinal studies is to determine the safety and efficacy of artesunate combined with other forms of adjunctive therapies for severe malaria.Methods: Following the PRISMA guidelines, we searched multiple databases with the search terms “artesunate” and “adjunctive therapy” and “severe malaria” in July 2020. If the search showed a randomized controlled trial, the study was included in this meta-analysis. The random-effects model was used to calculate the combined incidence rate and relative risk or risk difference.Results: This meta-analysis included nine longitudinal studies with 724 participants. We found that the mortality rates in the artesunate monotherapy group and the artesunate + adjuvant therapy group are similar (RD = −0.02, 95% confidence interval: −0.06–0.02). The incidence of adverse reactions in the artesunate monotherapy group and the artesunate + adjuvant therapy group was also similar.Conclusion: No significant differences in safety and efficacy were observed between the artesunate monotherapy group and the artesunate + adjuvant therapy group. Higher quality and rigorously designed randomized controlled studies are needed to validate our findings.

Keywords