Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology (Oct 2021)

In-vivo X-ray dark-field computed tomography for the detection of radiation-induced lung damage in mice

  • Rico Burkhardt,
  • Thomas Gora,
  • Alexander A. Fingerle,
  • Andreas P. Sauter,
  • Felix Meurer,
  • Florian T. Gassert,
  • Sophie Dobiasch,
  • Daniela Schilling,
  • Annette Feuchtinger,
  • Axel K. Walch,
  • Gabriele Multhoff,
  • Julia Herzen,
  • Peter B. Noël,
  • Ernst J. Rummeny,
  • Stephanie E. Combs,
  • Thomas E. Schmid,
  • Franz Pfeiffer,
  • Jan J. Wilkens

Journal volume & issue
Vol. 20
pp. 11 – 16

Abstract

Read online

Background and Purpose: Radiotherapy of thoracic tumours can lead to side effects in the lung, which may benefit from early diagnosis. We investigated the potential of X-ray dark-field computed tomography by a proof-of-principle murine study in a clinically relevant radiotherapeutic setting aiming at the detection of radiation-induced lung damage. Material and Methods: Six mice were irradiated with 20 Gy to the entire right lung. Together with five unirradiated control mice, they were imaged using computed tomography with absorption and dark-field contrast before and 16 weeks post irradiation. Mean pixel values for the right and left lung were calculated for both contrasts, and the right-to-left-ratio R of these means was compared. Radiologists also assessed the tomograms acquired 16 weeks post irradiation. Sensitivity, specificity, inter- and intra-reader accuracy were evaluated. Results: In absorption contrast the group-average of R showed no increase in the control group and increased by 7% (p = 0.005) in the irradiated group. In dark-field contrast, it increased by 2% in the control group and by 14% (p = 0.005) in the irradiated group. Specificity was 100% for both contrasts but sensitivity was almost four times higher using dark-field tomography. Two cases were missed by absorption tomography but were detected by dark-field tomography. Conclusions: The applicability of X-ray dark-field computed tomography for the detection of radiation-induced lung damage was demonstrated in a pre-clinical mouse model. The presented results illustrate the differences between dark-field and absorption contrast and show that dark-field tomography could be advantageous in future clinical settings.

Keywords