Journal of Food Quality (Jan 2017)

Ultrasound as an Alternative to Conventional Marination: Acceptability and Mass Transfer

  • Leopolda González-González,
  • Lorena Luna-Rodríguez,
  • Luis M. Carrillo-López,
  • Alma D. Alarcón-Rojo,
  • Iván García-Galicia,
  • Raúl Reyes-Villagrana

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/8675720
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 2017

Abstract

Read online

In this study, the effects of ultrasound- (US-) assisted beef marination on consumer perception and the homogeneity of the solute and mass transfer were evaluated. Marinated and US-treated meat samples (40 kHz, 11 W/cm2 for 20, 40, and 60 min, and storing at 4°C for 7 d) were evaluated by a group of consumers using a structured 9-point hedonic scale of satisfaction. The preferences were analyzed with XLSTAT-Sensory® software. The analysis was performed in conjunction with an energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopic study to evaluate the sodium transference. The perception analysis indicated that the use of US-assisted marination did not increase the beef acceptability. The sonicated samples showed a more homogeneous distribution of sodium. However, traditional marination (TM) stored for 7 d resulted in greater mass transfer than the US-assisted marination without storage.