Materials (Apr 2023)

Measurement and Classification Criteria of Strength Decrease Rate and Brittleness Indicator Index for Rockburst Proneness Evaluation of Hard Rocks

  • Kun Du,
  • Songge Yang,
  • Jian Zhou,
  • Lichang Wang

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16083101
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 16, no. 8
p. 3101

Abstract

Read online

Rockburst is one of the common geological hazards. It is of great significance to study the evaluation indexes and classification criteria of the bursting liability of hard rocks, which is important for the prediction and prevention of rockbursts in hard rocks. In this study, the evaluation of the rockburst tendency was conducted using two indoor non-energy indexes, namely the brittleness indicator (B2) and the strength decrease rate (SDR). The measuring methods of B and SDR as well as the classification criteria were analyzed. Firstly, the most rational calculation formulas for B and SDR were selected based on previous studies. The B2 equaled to the ratio between the difference and sum of uniaxial compressive strength and Brazilian tensile strength of rocks. The SDR was the average stress decrease rate of the post-peak stage in uniaxial compression tests and equaled the uniaxial compressive strength dividing the duration time of post-peak rock failure in uniaxial compression tests. Secondly, the uniaxial compression tests of different rock types were designed and carried out, and the change trend of B and SDR with the increase of loading rate in uniaxial compression tests were studied in detail. The results showed that after the loading rate was greater than 5 mm/min or 100 kN/min, the B value was affected, limited by the loading rate, while the SDR value was more affected by the strain rate. The displacement control, with a loading rate of 0.1–0.7 mm/min, was recommended for the measurement of B and SDR. The classification criteria of B2 and SDR were proposed, and four grades of rockburst tendency were defined for SDR and B2 according to the test results.

Keywords