NeuroImage: Clinical (Jan 2015)

Classification algorithms with multi-modal data fusion could accurately distinguish neuromyelitis optica from multiple sclerosis

  • Arman Eshaghi,
  • Sadjad Riyahi-Alam,
  • Roghayyeh Saeedi,
  • Tina Roostaei,
  • Arash Nazeri,
  • Aida Aghsaei,
  • Rozita Doosti,
  • Habib Ganjgahi,
  • Benedetta Bodini,
  • Ali Shakourirad,
  • Manijeh Pakravan,
  • Hossein Ghana'ati,
  • Kavous Firouznia,
  • Mojtaba Zarei,
  • Amir Reza Azimi,
  • Mohammad Ali Sahraian

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nicl.2015.01.001
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 7, no. C
pp. 306 – 314

Abstract

Read online

Neuromyelitis optica (NMO) exhibits substantial similarities to multiple sclerosis (MS) in clinical manifestations and imaging results and has long been considered a variant of MS. With the advent of a specific biomarker in NMO, known as anti-aquaporin 4, this assumption has changed; however, the differential diagnosis remains challenging and it is still not clear whether a combination of neuroimaging and clinical data could be used to aid clinical decision-making. Computer-aided diagnosis is a rapidly evolving process that holds great promise to facilitate objective differential diagnoses of disorders that show similar presentations. In this study, we aimed to use a powerful method for multi-modal data fusion, known as a multi-kernel learning and performed automatic diagnosis of subjects. We included 30 patients with NMO, 25 patients with MS and 35 healthy volunteers and performed multi-modal imaging with T1-weighted high resolution scans, diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) and resting-state functional MRI (fMRI). In addition, subjects underwent clinical examinations and cognitive assessments. We included 18 a priori predictors from neuroimaging, clinical and cognitive measures in the initial model. We used 10-fold cross-validation to learn the importance of each modality, train and finally test the model performance. The mean accuracy in differentiating between MS and NMO was 88%, where visible white matter lesion load, normal appearing white matter (DTI) and functional connectivity had the most important contributions to the final classification. In a multi-class classification problem we distinguished between all of 3 groups (MS, NMO and healthy controls) with an average accuracy of 84%. In this classification, visible white matter lesion load, functional connectivity, and cognitive scores were the 3 most important modalities. Our work provides preliminary evidence that computational tools can be used to help make an objective differential diagnosis of NMO and MS.

Keywords