Engenharia Agrícola (Dec 2015)

‘Sweet grape’ tomato post harvest packaging

  • Delvio Sandri,
  • Maria M. Rinaldi,
  • Taís A. Ishizawa,
  • Ananda H. N. Cunha,
  • Honorato C. Pacco,
  • Rafael B. Ferreira

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1590/1809-4430-Eng.Agric.v35n6p1093-1104/2015
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 35, no. 6
pp. 1093 – 1104

Abstract

Read online Read online

ABSTRACT This paper aims at evaluating the shelf life of mini tomatoes (Lycopersicum esculentum Mill.) cultivar ‘Sweet Grape’, grown in hydroponics, and stored under environmental and refrigerated conditions inside different packages. We adopted a completely randomized design, in which treatments were combinations of storage conditions: environment (e) and refrigerated (r) with packaging: polyvinyl chloride film (PVC); low-density polyethylene (LDPE); biofilm of tomato fruit of Solanum lycocarpum A.St.-Hil (lobeira) (TFB); cassava starch biofilm (CSB); carnauba wax (Copernicia prunifera) (CW), and without packaging - control (C). Physicochemical and sensory tests were carried out at the beginning (day zero), and at 8, 19, and 33 days of storage (DS). Fruit stored inside PVCr, LDPEe, LDPEr, and CWr had an acceptable shelf life of 33 days. The use of cassava and tomato starches were not effective in controlling fruit fresh weight loss. ‘Sweet Grape’ tomato postharvest conservation was enhanced under refrigerated conditions. The sensory evaluation results revealed that CWr treatment most pleased appraisers, while PCV had the highest rejection rate.

Keywords