eLife
(Jun 2023)
Response to comment on 'A conserved strategy for inducing appendage regeneration in moon jellyfish, Drosophila, and mice'
Yutian Li,
Anish A Sarma,
Iris T Lee,
Fayth Hui Tan,
Michael J Abrams,
Zevin J Condiotte,
Martin Heithe,
Misha Raffiee,
John O Dabiri,
David A Gold,
Lea Goentoro
Affiliations
Yutian Li
Division of Biology and Biological Engineering, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, United States
Anish A Sarma
Division of Biology and Biological Engineering, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, United States
Iris T Lee
Division of Biology and Biological Engineering, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, United States
Fayth Hui Tan
Division of Biology and Biological Engineering, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, United States
Michael J Abrams
Division of Biology and Biological Engineering, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, United States
Zevin J Condiotte
Division of Biology and Biological Engineering, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, United States
Martin Heithe
Division of Biology and Biological Engineering, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, United States
Misha Raffiee
Graduate Aerospace Laboratories and Mechanical Engineering, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, United States
John O Dabiri
Graduate Aerospace Laboratories and Mechanical Engineering, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, United States
David A Gold
Division of Biology and Biological Engineering, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, United States
Lea Goentoro
ORCiD
Division of Biology and Biological Engineering, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, United States
DOI
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.85370
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 12
Abstract
Read online
Previously we reported evidence that a regenerative response in the appendages of moon jellyfish, fruit flies, and mice can be promoted by nutrient modulation (Abrams et al., 2021). Sustar and Tuthill subsequently reported that they had not been able to reproduce the induced regenerative response in flies (Sustar and Tuthill, 2023). Here we discuss that differences in the amputation method, treatment concentrations, age of the animals, and stress management explain why they did not observe a regenerative response in flies. Typically, 30–50% of treated flies showed response in our assay.
Keywords
Published in eLife
ISSN
2050-084X (Online)
Publisher
eLife Sciences Publications Ltd
Country of publisher
United Kingdom
LCC subjects
Medicine
Science: Biology (General)
Website
https://elifesciences.org
About the journal
WeChat QR code
Close