PLoS Genetics (Jun 2007)

Whole-genome cartography of estrogen receptor alpha binding sites.

  • Chin-Yo Lin,
  • Vinsensius B Vega,
  • Jane S Thomsen,
  • Tao Zhang,
  • Say Li Kong,
  • Min Xie,
  • Kuo Ping Chiu,
  • Leonard Lipovich,
  • Daniel H Barnett,
  • Fabio Stossi,
  • Ailing Yeo,
  • Joshy George,
  • Vladimir A Kuznetsov,
  • Yew Kok Lee,
  • Tze Howe Charn,
  • Nallasivam Palanisamy,
  • Lance D Miller,
  • Edwin Cheung,
  • Benita S Katzenellenbogen,
  • Yijun Ruan,
  • Guillaume Bourque,
  • Chia-Lin Wei,
  • Edison T Liu

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.0030087
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 3, no. 6
p. e87

Abstract

Read online

Using a chromatin immunoprecipitation-paired end diTag cloning and sequencing strategy, we mapped estrogen receptor alpha (ERalpha) binding sites in MCF-7 breast cancer cells. We identified 1,234 high confidence binding clusters of which 94% are projected to be bona fide ERalpha binding regions. Only 5% of the mapped estrogen receptor binding sites are located within 5 kb upstream of the transcriptional start sites of adjacent genes, regions containing the proximal promoters, whereas vast majority of the sites are mapped to intronic or distal locations (>5 kb from 5' and 3' ends of adjacent transcript), suggesting transcriptional regulatory mechanisms over significant physical distances. Of all the identified sites, 71% harbored putative full estrogen response elements (EREs), 25% bore ERE half sites, and only 4% had no recognizable ERE sequences. Genes in the vicinity of ERalpha binding sites were enriched for regulation by estradiol in MCF-7 cells, and their expression profiles in patient samples segregate ERalpha-positive from ERalpha-negative breast tumors. The expression dynamics of the genes adjacent to ERalpha binding sites suggest a direct induction of gene expression through binding to ERE-like sequences, whereas transcriptional repression by ERalpha appears to be through indirect mechanisms. Our analysis also indicates a number of candidate transcription factor binding sites adjacent to occupied EREs at frequencies much greater than by chance, including the previously reported FOXA1 sites, and demonstrate the potential involvement of one such putative adjacent factor, Sp1, in the global regulation of ERalpha target genes. Unexpectedly, we found that only 22%-24% of the bona fide human ERalpha binding sites were overlapping conserved regions in whole genome vertebrate alignments, which suggest limited conservation of functional binding sites. Taken together, this genome-scale analysis suggests complex but definable rules governing ERalpha binding and gene regulation.