Pathogens (Dec 2022)

Evaluation of S- and M-Proteins Expressed in <i>Escherichia coli</i> and HEK Cells for Serological Detection of Antibodies in Response to SARS-CoV-2 Infections and mRNA-Based Vaccinations

  • Mandy Schwarze,
  • Ji Luo,
  • Alexandra Brakel,
  • Andor Krizsan,
  • Nicole Lakowa,
  • Thomas Grünewald,
  • Claudia Lehmann,
  • Johannes Wolf,
  • Stephan Borte,
  • Sanja Milkovska-Stamenova,
  • Jörg Gabert,
  • Markus Scholz,
  • Ralf Hoffmann

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens11121515
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 11, no. 12
p. 1515

Abstract

Read online

This study investigated the IgG and IgA antibody response against recombinant S1 and receptor binding domains (RBD) of the spike (S-) protein and the membrane (M-) protein using a set of 115 serum samples collected from patients infected with SARS-CoV-2 in Germany before April 2021 using protein and peptide ELISA. As S1- and RBD-proteins expressed in Escherichia coli provided poor sensitivities in ELISA, they were replaced by proteins expressed in HEK cells. The RBD-ELISA provided a sensitivity of 90.6% (N = 85) for samples collected from patients with confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infections more than 14 days after symptom onset or a positive PCR test. In population-based controls, the specificity was 97.9% (N = 94). In contrast, the sensitivities were only 41.2% and 72.6% for M- and N-proteins, respectively, while the specificities were 88.5% and 100%, respectively. Considering also 20 samples collected during the first two weeks of symptom onset or PCR confirmation, the sensitivity of RBD- and N-protein ELISA decreased to 82.6% and 72.6%, respectively. The combination of two data sets, i.e., N- and RBD-, N- and M-, or RBD- and M-proteins increased the sensitivity to 85.8%, 77.9%, and 87.8%, respectively. Peptide mapping mostly confirmed epitopes previously reported for S1- and M-proteins, but they were only recognized by a few samples already tested positive in the corresponding protein ELISA indicating that peptide-based assays will not improve the diagnostic sensitivity.

Keywords