Transplantation Direct (Feb 2024)

Treatment of Complex Desmoid Tumors in Familial Adenomatous Polyposis Syndrome by Intestinal Transplantation

  • Emilio Canovai, MD, PhD,
  • Andrew Butler, MD, PhD,
  • Susan Clark, MD, PhD,
  • Andrew Latchford, MD, PhD,
  • Ashish Sinha, MD, PhD,
  • Lisa Sharkey, MD,
  • Charlotte Rutter, MD,
  • Neil Russell, MD,
  • Sara Upponi, MD,
  • Irum Amin, MD

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/TXD.0000000000001571
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 10, no. 2
p. e1571

Abstract

Read online

Background. Desmoid tumors are fibroblastic lesions which often have an unpredictable and variable clinical course. In the context of familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP), these frequently occur intra-abdominally, especially in the small-bowel mesentery resulting in sepsis, fistulation, and invasion of the abdominal wall and retroperitoneum. In selected cases where other modalities have failed, the most radical option is to perform a total enterectomy and intestinal transplantation (ITx). In this study, we present our center’s experience of ITx for desmoid in patients with FAP. Methods. We performed a retrospective review of our prospectively collected database between 2007 and 2022. All patients undergoing ITx for FAP-related desmoid were included. Results. Between October 2007 and September 2023, 144 ITx were performed on 130 patients at our center. Of these, 15 patients (9%) were for desmoid associated with FAP (7 modified multivisceral transplants, 6 isolated ITx, and 2 liver-containing grafts). The median follow-up was 57 mo (8–119); 5-y patient survival was 82%, all with functioning grafts without local desmoid recurrence. These patients presented us with several complex surgical issues, such as loss of abdominal domain, retroperitoneal/abdominal wall involvement, ileoanal pouch–related issues, and the need for foregut resection because of adenomatous disease. Conclusions. ITx is a viable treatment in selected patients with FAP and extensive desmoid disease. The decision to refer for ITx can be challenging, particularly the timing and sequence of treatment (simultaneous versus sequential exenteration). Delays can result in additional disease burden, such as secondary liver disease or invasion of adjacent structures.