Cancer Control (Apr 2023)

Application of Comprehensive Genomic Profiling-Based Next-Generation Sequencing Assay to Improve Cancer Care in a Developing Country

  • Claudia Cifuentes,
  • Milton Lombana,
  • Henry Vargas,
  • Paola Laguado,
  • Alejandro Ruiz-Patiño,
  • Leonardo Rojas,
  • Uriel Navarro,
  • Carlos Vargas,
  • Luisa Ricaurte,
  • Oscar Arrieta,
  • Lucia Zatarain-Barron,
  • Leandro Zapata,
  • Guido González,
  • Carlos Ortiz,
  • Laura Bernal,
  • Juan G. Restrepo,
  • Lucia Viola,
  • Fabio Grosso,
  • Ricardo Zapata,
  • William Mantilla,
  • Hernán Carranza,
  • Iván Bustillo,
  • Néstor Llinas,
  • Ricardo Duarte,
  • July Rodríguez,
  • Pilar Archila,
  • Jenny Ávila,
  • Maritza Bermúdez,
  • Tatiana Gámez,
  • Carolina Sotelo,
  • Jorge Otero,
  • Elkin Forero,
  • Mauricio Lema,
  • Catalina Limpias,
  • Camila Ordóñez-Reyes,
  • Sergio Mejía,
  • Christian Rolfo,
  • Rafael Rosell,
  • Andrés F. Cardona,
  • ,

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/10732748231175256
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 30

Abstract

Read online

Purpose Identifying actionable oncogenic mutations have changed the therapeutic landscape in different types of tumors. This study investigated the utility of comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP), a hybrid capture-based next-generation sequencing (NGS) assay, in clinical practice in a developing country. Methods In this retrospective cohort study, CGP was performed on clinical samples from patients with different solid tumors recruited between December 2016 and November 2020, using hybrid capture-based genomic profiling, at the individual treating physicians’ request in the clinical care for therapy decisions. Kaplan–Meier survival curves were estimated to characterize the time-to-event variables. Results Patients median age was 61 years (range: 14–87 years), and 64.7% were female. The most common histological diagnosis was lung primary tumors, with 90 patients corresponding to 52.9% of the samples (95% CI 45.4-60.4%). Actionable mutations with FDA-approved medications for specific alterations correspondent to tumoral histology were identified in 58 cases (46.4%), whereas other alterations were detected in 47 different samples (37.6%). The median overall survival was 15.5 months (95% CI 11.7 months-NR). Patients who were subjected to genomic evaluation at diagnosis reached a median overall survival of 18.3 months (95% CI 14.9 months-NR) compared to 14.1 months (95% CI 11.1 months-NR) in patients who obtained genomic evaluation after tumor progression and during standard treatment ( P = .7). Conclusion CGP of different types of tumors identifies clinically relevant genomic alterations that have benefited from targeted therapy and improve cancer care in a developing country to guide personalized treatment to beneficial outcomes of cancer patients.