Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Global Open (Jun 2023)

Transfacial Two-pin External Mandibular Distraction Osteogenesis: A Technique for Neonatal Airway Obstruction from Robin Sequence

  • Haithem Elhadi Babiker, MD, DMD,
  • Christopher M. Runyan, MD, PhD,
  • Griffin P. Bins, MD,
  • Jeremie D. Oliver, MS,
  • Dominic A. Massary, MD,
  • Lyfong S. Lor, MD,
  • Scott J. Rapp, MD,
  • Brian S. Pan, MD,
  • Christopher B. Gordon, MD

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000005085
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 11, no. 6
p. e5085

Abstract

Read online

Background:. Surgical management in those with moderate-to-severe airway obstruction includes tongue-lip adhesion, tracheostomy, and/or mandibular distraction osteogenesis. This article describes a transfacial two-pin external device technique for mandibular distraction osteogenesis, utilizing minimal dissection. Methods:. The first percutaneous pin is transcutaneously placed just inferior to the sigmoid notch parallel to the interpupillary line. The pin is then advanced through the pterygoid musculature at the base of the pterygoid plates, toward the contralateral ramus, and exits the skin. A second parallel pin is placed spanning the bilateral mandibular parasymphysis distal to the region of the future canine. With the pins in place, bilateral high ramus transverse corticotomies are performed. Using univector distractor devices, the length of activation varies, with the goal of overdistraction to achieve a class III relationship of the alveolar ridges. Consolidation is limited to a 1:1 period with the activation phase, and removal is performed by cutting and pulling the pins out of the face. Results:. To guide optimal transcutaneous pin placement, transfacial pins were then placed through twenty segmented mandibles. Mean upper pin (UP) distance was 20.7 ± 1.1 mm from the tragus. The distance between the cutaneous entry of the UP and lower pin was 23.5 ± 0.9 mm, and the tragion-UP-lower pin angle was 118.7 ± 2.9°. Conclusions:. The two-pin technique has potential advantages regarding nerve injury and mandibular growth, given an intraoral approach with limited dissection. It may safely be performed on neonates whose small size may preclude the use of internal distractor devices.