Canadian Respiratory Journal (Jan 2009)

Comparison of Per Cent Predicted and Percentile Values for Pulmonary Function Test Interpretation

  • Smita Pakhale,
  • Zoheir Bshouty,
  • Theodore K Marras

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1155/2009/912185
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 16, no. 6
pp. 189 – 193

Abstract

Read online

BACKGROUND: Pulmonary function tests (PFTs) are commonly interpreted as a fraction of predicted normal values, with an abnormal test often defined as less than 80% or greater than 120% of the predicted value. However, recommendations of the American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society suggest using a percentile-based approach to define an abnormal test (less than the fifth or greater than the 95th percentiles).