Genome Medicine (Jan 2021)

Family history assessment significantly enhances delivery of precision medicine in the genomics era

  • Yasmin Bylstra,
  • Weng Khong Lim,
  • Sylvia Kam,
  • Koei Wan Tham,
  • R. Ryanne Wu,
  • Jing Xian Teo,
  • Sonia Davila,
  • Jyn Ling Kuan,
  • Sock Hoai Chan,
  • Nicolas Bertin,
  • Cheng Xi Yang,
  • Steve Rozen,
  • Bin Tean Teh,
  • Khung Keong Yeo,
  • Stuart Alexander Cook,
  • Saumya Shekhar Jamuar,
  • Geoffrey S. Ginsburg,
  • Lori A. Orlando,
  • Patrick Tan

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13073-020-00819-1
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 13, no. 1
pp. 1 – 11

Abstract

Read online

Abstract Background Family history has traditionally been an essential part of clinical care to assess health risks. However, declining sequencing costs have precipitated a shift towards genomics-first approaches in population screening programs rendering the value of family history unknown. We evaluated the utility of incorporating family history information for genomic sequencing selection. Methods To ascertain the relationship between family histories on such population-level initiatives, we analysed whole genome sequences of 1750 research participants with no known pre-existing conditions, of which half received comprehensive family history assessment of up to four generations, focusing on 95 cancer genes. Results Amongst the 1750 participants, 866 (49.5%) had high-quality standardised family history available. Within this group, 73 (8.4%) participants had an increased family history risk of cancer (increased FH risk cohort) and 1 in 7 participants (n = 10/73) carried a clinically actionable variant inferring a sixfold increase compared with 1 in 47 participants (n = 17/793) assessed at average family history cancer risk (average FH risk cohort) (p = 0.00001) and a sevenfold increase compared to 1 in 52 participants (n = 17/884) where family history was not available (FH not available cohort) (p = 0.00001). The enrichment was further pronounced (up to 18-fold) when assessing only the 25 cancer genes in the American College of Medical Genetics (ACMG) Secondary Findings (SF) genes. Furthermore, 63 (7.3%) participants had an increased family history cancer risk in the absence of an apparent clinically actionable variant. Conclusions These findings demonstrate that the collection and analysis of comprehensive family history and genomic data are complementary and in combination can prioritise individuals for genomic analysis. Thus, family history remains a critical component of health risk assessment, providing important actionable data when implementing genomics screening programs. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02791152 . Retrospectively registered on May 31, 2016.

Keywords