Diagnostic tools in diagnosing acute appendicitis - Alvarado Score, CRP, USG, and CT (Abdomen)

Abstract

Aims. To evaluate scope of diagnosing tools-Alvarado score, CRP, USG, and CT in acute appendicitis. Method. Conducted observational study of 152 patients in Department of Emergency Medicine, Sri Ramachandra Medical College and Research Institute, Chennai, India between January to December 2022. The diagnostic tool’s (Alvarado score, CRP, USG, CT (abdomen), sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and ROC were analyzed to diagnose acute appendicitis. Results. Among 152 study patients, males - 86, females - 66, higher number of age group was 7-61.2%) (0.0271), CRP - identified 95.1% (<0.001), USG identified (group 1-33%, group 2-12.2%, group 3-11.3%, and group 4-43.5%, and CT identified 152/152 (100%) patients with acute appendicitis. The odds ratio/95% CI of diagnostic tools (USG - 0.878, 0.66, CRP - 7.337, 2.623, Alvarado score - 0.81, 0.687). Sensitivity (Alvarado's score - 84.74%, USG - 83.33%, CRP - 76.43%), and specificity was (Alvarado's score - 84.32, USG - 72.97%, CRP-83.86%. The PPV (Alvarado's score - 74.56%, USG -75.5%, CRP - 33.16%), NPV (Alvarado's score - 32.5%, USG - 79.1%, CRP - 81.03%), and diagnostic accuracy (Alvarado's score - 72.01%, USG - 73.05%, CRP - 68.81%). ROC in individual tools-Alvarado score was specific than USG, and CRP. ROC in combination tools Alvarado score and USG was specific than USG, and CRP. Conclusion. Among the diagnostic tools tested, as individual tool-Alvarado score was specific, in combination, and Alvarado score and USG were accurate, specific, sensitive, hence combination of tools will identify acute appendicitis early to reduce mortality by undiagnosed or late diagnosed.

Keywords

• acute appendicitis
• alvarado score
• c-reactive-protein (crp)
• ultrasonography (usg)
• computed tomography (ct)
• appendix
• diagnostic tools