Animal Microbiome (Nov 2024)

Changes in social environment impact primate gut microbiota composition

  • Colleen S. Pearce,
  • Danielle Bukovsky,
  • Katya Douchant,
  • Abhay Katoch,
  • Jill Greenlaw,
  • Daniel J. Gale,
  • Joseph Y. Nashed,
  • Don Brien,
  • Valerie A. Kuhlmeier,
  • Mark A. Sabbagh,
  • Gunnar Blohm,
  • Fernanda G. De Felice,
  • Martin Pare,
  • Douglas J. Cook,
  • Stephen H. Scott,
  • Douglas P. Munoz,
  • Calvin P. Sjaarda,
  • Anita Tusche,
  • Prameet M. Sheth,
  • Andrew Winterborn,
  • Susan Boehnke,
  • Jason P. Gallivan

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s42523-024-00355-y
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 6, no. 1
pp. 1 – 15

Abstract

Read online

Abstract Background The gut microbiota (GM) has proven to be essential for both physical health and mental wellbeing, yet the forces that ultimately shape its composition remain opaque. One critical force known to affect the GM is the social environment. Prior work in humans and free-ranging non-human primates has shown that cohabitation and frequent social interaction can lead to changes in GM composition. However, it is difficult to assess the direction of causation in these studies, and interpretations are complicated by the influence of uncontrolled but correlated factors, such as shared diet. Results We performed a 15-month longitudinal investigation wherein we disentangled the impacts of diet and social living conditions on GM composition in a captive cohort of 13 male cynomolgus macaques. The animals were in single housing for the first 3 months of the study initially with a variable diet. After baseline data collection they were placed on a controlled diet for the remainder of the study. Following this diet shift the animals were moved to paired housing for 6 months, enabling enhanced social interaction, and then subsequently returned to single housing at the end of our study. This structured sequencing of diet and housing changes allowed us to assess their distinct impacts on GM composition. We found that the early dietary adjustments led to GM changes in both alpha and beta diversity, whereas changes in social living conditions only altered beta diversity. With respect to the latter, we found that two particular bacterial families — Lactobacillaceae and Clostridiaceae — demonstrated significant shifts in abundance during the transition from single housing to paired housing, which was distinct from the shifts we observed based on a change in diet. Conversely, we found that other bacteria previously associated with sociality were not altered based on changes in social living conditions but rather only by changes in diet. Conclusions Together, these findings decouple the influences that diet and social living have on GM composition and reconcile previous observations in the human and animal literatures. Moreover, the results indicate biological alterations of the gut that may, in part, mediate the relationship between sociality and wellbeing.

Keywords